Wikibooks:Featured books/Nominations/Addition/Anatomy and Physiology of Animals

Anatomy and Physiology of Animals
This is a complete and detailed book with some excellent illustrations. It has a clear preface of its aims and it delivers the contents in a straight forward structure. In my opinion an excellent book. --AdRiley (talk) 07:22, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|15px]] Support You're right, this book should have FB status. I might consider reducing the illustrations, but that's it. A clearly standard book. Laleena (talk) 12:53, 25 January 2008 (UTC)


 * [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|15px]] Support All I have to say about this book is Wow! I really like the level at which it is written.  I would leave every illustration that's there intact though.  IMHO, they add rather than detract. --Jomegat (talk) 13:58, 25 January 2008 (UTC)


 * [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|15px]] Support I like this book, and It's certainly worthy of being featured. We all know that being featured doesnt mean that the book is "complete", so in the long term I would like to see improvements in terms of better and more creative formatting, a print and PDF version (which I could work on myself when I have more time), and other details that will transform this book from "good" to "great". --Whiteknight (Page) (Talk) 15:07, 25 January 2008 (UTC)


 * [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|15px]] Support - This book has excellent content, which is the heart of any textbook. Whiteknight is right, though, that some formatting would go a long way to improve it even further. – Mike.lifeguard  &#124; talk 14:32, 29 January 2008 (UTC)


 * [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|15px]] Support - this is a Good Book. The illustrations are good, and really add to the book, although some images should be converted to wiki markup for added clarity (e.g. tables, some formulae). Could do with some navigation links added. Still, it is a very nice book and deserves to be featured. Webaware talk 22:51, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Done This is an excellent book that I would call to the prestigious status of being featured. I will arrange for the templates to be made, and also, I would like to note that, to those who would contribute further to this book or a related one, the Wikijunior book is is poor shape. Cheers, Laleena (talk) 23:07, 29 January 2008 (UTC)