User talk:Zhang xinli2012

TThis page is going to be used for online project of the Module: Living in a Connected World.

Wiki Exercise#1 Discussion about My Screen-time Survey
We know that the screen is a different information receiving application, such as computers, tablets, mobile phones, game consoles that we usually can't do every day, and should also include movie screens, building peripherals or bus advertisements. Screening. It can be said that our life is surrounded by a variety of screens. We are consciously or unconsciously touching various screens every day, and the screen often attracts our attention and takes up our time.

If you categorize the screen, I want to divide the screen into active touch screens and passive touch screens. In the first category, we actively touch screens such as mobile phones, computers, and game consoles. The kind of screen often takes up a lot of our time. It is undeniable that there are so many attractive information in mobile phones. Social media or entertainment games are using fragmented information to take up most of our leisure time, so many teenagers Screen addiction, they give generously to the small screen in their hands for most of the day. The second category is the screen we passively touch, such as advertising screens on busy streets or advertising screens on some buses. The type of screen does not take up a lot of our time, but we often can't escape them.

When we talk about screen time, I think the most important thing is who has the initiative. Is it in our control of the screen time or screen time to dominate our life. Always on theory tells us that even if we don't spend all our time on the screen, we always keep in touch with the network. The relationship between people and technologies they use in everyday life as “tethered”. Obviously, the importance of the internet in our lives. If we can control the screen time, we have the initiative to information. Instead, when we are addicted to the network, we lose the initiative in information.

All in all, we have to take the initiative by controlling the screen time. It is dangerous when we are dominated by screens，especially for teenagers, as described by Sherry Turkle in Always on/Always on you: The Tethered Self. Today's teenagers provide our first view of network sharing from a development perspective. Adolescents want to be both part of a group and maintain their personal identity, both to their peers and to maintain and restrain. There are more requirements for sharing support groups: In a friendship group between urban teenagers, friends often want their peers to remain available via mobile or instant messaging, sharing their confidence, anxiety and moments of victory. In this social contract, there is a good reason to ask for time to be “offline”. The pressure of always online can be a burden. Young people who need uninterrupted time to go to school resort to using their parents' Internet accounts to evade their friends. Other consequences of an always-on/always-on communication culture can be difficult to manage and even more durable. Zhang xinli2012 (discuss • contribs) 16:00, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Exercise#2 Annotated Bibliography
(1)Liqian，H.（2018）Study on the perceived popularity of Tik Tok. http://dspace.bu.ac.th/bitstream/123456789/3649/1/Hou%20Liqian.pdf (2) ln this article Liqian study whether product positioning, content diversity and product uniqueness will significantly affect the popularity of the "Tik Tok" app. (3)The author tried to determine the prevalence of Tik Tok by setting up a conceptual model and using data obtained from a questionnaire distributed in Beijing via the Internet, and whether it was related to product positioning, content diversity, and product uniqueness. (4) The scope of her research It is to evaluate the factors that affect the popularity of "Tik Tok", such as product positioning, content diversity, and content uniqueness. (5) The article is useful to my research topic, as Liqian suggest that there are many factors for the success of "Tik Tok". (6) The main limitation of the article is that the survey sample was restricted to the residents over 18 years old in Beijing. (7) Thus the authors indicate that further, more extensive, research needs to be committed to develop a more in-depth understanding of product positioning and conte nt uniqueness. (8) This article will form the basis of my research, and it will be useful supplementary information for my research on social media apps.

What is Plogging
Plogging is a combination of (jogging) and (picking up) litter (Swedish: plocka upp). in other words，it is plucking + jogging, which is running and picking up trash. Joggers participating in this movement only need to take a bag and a pair of gloves. When they saw the garbage on the ground, they will pick it up. Plogging was born in Sweden, spread throughout Europe through social media, and entered the United States, Mexico, and other regions. Although the way of exercise is simple, In the eyes of Erik, there is no more convenient and environmentally friendly exercise than picking up trash while running. Erik Ahlstrom said that when he moved from a ski town to the city centre, he found a lot of hidden domestic garbage. He decided to organize a jogging group. Every weekend holiday, he and a group of jogging enthusiasts went to the park and outdoor streets to pick up garbage, while doing fitness to clean the environment at the same time. During the activities, jogging enthusiasts took pictures of the trash and posting them on Instagram or Facebook, which resonated with people from all over the world, and Plogging quickly became popular. Ahlstrom said, "Find more people to do this together, the more fun you have, people will be infected with each other. "



Why is it so popular?
New trends in social media.On Instagram alone, more than 10,000 posts have been tagged # plogging. Plogging's rise and development are inseparable from the promotion of social media. The traditional runners' way of posting running or selfies is outdated; the latest social media Fashion is picking trash while running. There are many opinion leaders on social media, who are always happy to support the correct values of social action. When online celebrities start to do this, social media will quickly send the messages to their followers, a new round of fashion has begun. There is no doubt that social media is the most critical technological means to promote the development of plogging.

Affects people's behaviors and perceptions
“Plogging concept “has caused more and more resonance. In Germany, the United States, Thailand, China, and India, there are many followers of this event. If we think that Plogging is just a show, then we ignored the environmental awareness behind the behaviours and the power of the group. This movement changed the behaviour habits of participants and changed their environmental protection concepts. It made more people aware of environmental protection. The environmental protection movement can be stylish, and it provides participants with the best example of protecting the environment. Therefore, the movement is also tacitly educating people on how to treat our world in a way. "Civil society" and "public sphere" are not always opposed. At least in the field of protecting our environment, they have a common goal. For individuals, plogging can help participants keep healthy. Plogging consumes more calories than jogging or brisk walking. According to statistics, the sports effect of running while picking up trash Even better than regular running. As a workout, it provides variation in body movements by adding bending, squatting and stretching to the main action of running, hiking, or walking. Plogging is not only supported by individuals, but also by some fashion brand companies. Runners can exchange a pair of sneakers with the collected 17 plastic bottles, which is a good advertising for sports brands. Furthermore, environmental protection sports are suitable for the "public sphere ". For this social movement, there seem to be no losers.

What kind of platform is Wikibooks?
The term wiki-wiki is a Hawaiian phrase meaning “quick” and has been added to the American lexicon, in large part because of Wikipedia, the world’s free source of “the sum of all human knowledge” (Wales, 2004). Wikibooks is a free, and open-source online encyclopedia with every user. Anyone can edit any article and entry in Wikipedia. Wikipedia is co-written by volunteers from all over the world. It has grown rapidly and has become one of the largest source websites, creating thousands of new entries to complete the content of Wikipedia.

Cooperation
Wikis have been credited with increasing democracy within groups by focusing on the community rather than the individual, thus increasing students’ skills in collaborative work (Holmes, Tangney, FitzGibbon, Savage, & Meehan, 2001). The terms equality, openness, collaboration, and sharing are the core idea of Wikibooks. Wikibooks is a complex network social institution. In other words, Wiki is just a collaboration tool. But its ideas may pry our lives. Wikipedia's multi-person collaboration concept allows it to gather a large number of advocates and contribute selflessly to it. Everyone can be a topic of interest to them Add information.For example, in this Collaborative Essay, I chose the topic of antisocial games and shared the case of blue whale games.

Strong interactivity
it used to help facilitate collaborative research in many ways, such as Discussion Page. Discussion Page is a good tool in the process of communicating with my peers. It is like a group diary, and each of our ideas will be recorded. During the process of completing collaborative essay I often check the discussion page. At the same time, when I have a good idea, I will immediately upload it to the Page and share it with my teammate. So wikibooks is a very interactive website. Not only the discussion page is important in collaborative research. The book page is the main position for interaction and cooperation. A team must work together to complete the collaborative essay, which means we must identify common topics and content through communication. It was a challenge for us, but when we completed it step by step, I gained a great sense of accomplishment. Wikibooks helps users get closer and gain a sense of participation by letting users collaborate to complete a task. I think it is also a way of fostering a community for wikibooks.

Knowledge community
Fuchs Kittowski and Köhler (2005) reported that wikis support “cooperative community knowledge generation” by allowing users to create and maintain a “community knowledge base, offering a quick, simple way to produce and review information that can be gathered and linked to other wiki pages ” In this community, there is no status difference among users, but only the fragmented relationship between knowledge. Participants maintain a close relationship through the division of knowledge, cooperation and sharing. Woodruff and Meyer (1997) indicated that the community dynamics help further foster knowledge advancement. Similarly, Bandura (1997) argued that people learn through observing others’ behavior, attitudes, and outcomes of those behaviors known as vicarious learning. Wikipedia continues to grow and become the giant encyclopedia in human history. Wikipedia is not just a web encyclopedia; it is also a way of life for users. Wikipedia finds their own the information you need is to find your sense of belonging in the community created by Wikipedia and realize your self-worth. The emergence of Wiki has brought people a new choice of online communication and publishing methods.

INSTRUCTOR FEEDBACK: ESSAY DISCUSSION PAGE
Students should be engaging at least once a day, for the duration of the project. The following points illustrate how this engagement was evaluated.

Evidence from contribs to both editing and discussion of content (i.e. volume and breadth of editorial activity as evidenced through ‘contribs’). These are primarily considered for quality rather than quantity, but as a broad guideline:
 * Each item on a contribs list that are 1000+ characters are deemed “substantial”: none
 * Items on a contribs list that are <1000 characters are important, and are considered in the round when evaluating contribs as a whole because of their aggregate value: only a small number contribs to essay discussion in total (certainly not for the duration of the project), and not near the level, advised in the wikilabs, although one or two useful ones.
 * It is expected that you will make at least one contrib per day, for the duration of the project: see above, this would have been greatly improved by following the advice in labs and in the assessment brief

GregXenon01 (discuss • contribs) 13:18, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

Instructor Feedback on Wiki Exercise Portfolio
Posts of this standard roughly correspond to the following grade descriptor. Depending on where your actual mark is in relation to the making criteria as outlined in the relevant documentation, it should give you an idea of strengths and weaknesses within the achieved grade band overall:


 * Satisfactory. Among other things, pass entries may try to relate an idea from the module to an original example, but might not be very convincing. They may waste space on synopsis or description, rather than making a point. They may have spelling or grammatical errors and typos. They might not demonstrate more than a single quick pass at the assignment, informed only by lecture and/or cursory reading. They may suggest reading but not thinking (or indeed the reverse). The wiki markup formatting will need some work.


 * This work is at the lower end of this grade band, so there’s clearly room for improvement here. I think in order to engage with the wiki exercises a bit more, it might be useful for you to take a closer look at the assessment brief to get more of an idea of how to hit those targets.


 * Making more use of the wiki functionality and markup would have gone a long way to improving fluidity and functionality of posts. I suspect that, if you become more familiar and proficient with the platform, that this will make a considerable difference.

General:

In addition to the common marking scheme, there are three broad criteria widely employed in the Division, which are used to help assessors evaluate your work in a more general sense:

Reading and research: is there evidence of critical engagement with set materials?; is there evidence of independent reading of appropriate academic and peer-reviewed material? For this element, your work has been evaluated as: Marginal/Poor

Argument and analysis: Is argument well-articulated and well-supported?; is there evidence of critical thinking (through taking a position in relation to key ideas from the module, and supporting this position)?; is there evidence of relational thinking (through making connections between key ideas from the module and wider literature, and supporting these connections)?; is there evidence of independent critical ability? For this element, your work has been evaluated as: Marginal/Poor

Presentation: academic writing style and structure, and organisational skills For this element, your work has been evaluated as: Pass

GregXenon01 (discuss • contribs) 13:27, 19 December 2019 (UTC)