User talk:Xania/Archive 3

Featured books / nominations
Twice or three times in the past week or so, IP editors have put up a book in the Featured Books Nominations page that is not, in fact, a Wikibook. I'm reluctant to suggest that we should limit editing that page to those who have accounts, but perhaps it is necessary... we're not in the business of advertising other people's books, of course, nor of providing a home for those advertisements, IMHO. Chazz (talk) 04:45, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
 * I see that QuiteUnusual has now protected the page. Seems like a good idea for now.  We do seem to be inviting people to nominate any book on pages like Featured_books which has a nice big button saying Nominate a book.--ЗAНИA [[Image:Flag_of_Estonia.svg|15px]]talk 11:10, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
 * True, that. Still, I would have thought that, seeing this is the English Wikibooks site, that they would have at least had the courtesy to try to push books that are in English... Well, we'll see what happens. Maybe the button text should be changed? "Nominate a Wikibook"? Chazz (talk) 16:24, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Good idea, done... QuiteUnusual (discuss • contribs) 17:10, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the welcome
Thanks for your warm welcome, ЗAНИA! CatanOverlord (discuss • contribs) 17:33, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
 * May I tag along here and also thank you for my welcome too. And also for checking my change. In case it is not already obvious, I certainly know more about wiki editing than I currently do about the goals of Wikibooks, so please set me straight if this kind of edit is regarded as not being appropriate! AuFCL (discuss • contribs) 07:06, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Plagiarism on World History
The wikibook World History(which it seems has had little activity for long time) seems to be largely plagiarism, I was suspicious and you have already seen/approved the first edit I made of deleting copied materials. It looks like theirs alot more than that, should I go head and delete more? Most of this looks like it would violate copyright laws although some looks likes it copied and pasted from other wikibooks, is that ok(they were not cited)? -Worldhistorian123 Worldhistorian123 (discuss • contribs) 02:06, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I have replied on your talk page. --ЗAНИA [[Image:Flag_of_Estonia.svg|15px]]talk 02:19, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Movede to hu.wikibooks
Sorry for the C programozás/Változók‎ and C programozás articles. I have moved them to [hu.wikibooks https://hu.wikibooks.org/wiki/C_programoz%C3%A1s]. These articles can be deleted now. -- Harp (discuss • contribs) 11:31, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
 * no problem. Id guessed they were Hungarian or Finnish. (xania, no tildes on the phone!)

Reviewing pages
As you can see, I have reviewed a few cookbook pages, and am almost done with all of the cookbook pages for reviewing. How's your progress? --goldenburg111 (talk) 01:30, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
 * hi, can you please answer my question? --goldenburg111 (talk) 18:08, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
 * At present I haven't had much time for reviews. Around 900 unreviewed still.--ЗAНИA [[Image:Flag_of_Estonia.svg|15px]]talk 20:28, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
 * thanks :-) --goldenburg111 (talk) 21:35, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the speedyD help
I had trouble getting '&' to behave in a link forming template and consequently need a number of pages double moved (I'd stubbed in before I noticed the url malformation). That is possibly some to back over the redirect where they came from initially... OR at least one like that as below. I'm still trying to juggle organizing things into 4+ sub-books (Divisions) vice 4+ volumes, so I've no list yet to hand off.
 * re: There may be the one mess I'm thinking of.''


 * What's the 'going rate' and the best place to commission such work. I pay top-Wiki-dollars!  Seriously, is there an admins notice board, etc.

Thanks for the help, Answer here or on my talk if you want to back and forth. I'm currently working on updating Trainz at least 12 hrs a day. Skype is an option if we really need a conference! LOL Best regards, Frank // Fra nkB 06:42, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
 * trimmed // Fra nkB 09:12, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Not sure exactly what you want. If there are pages that need moving let me know or leave a message on Reading_room/Administrative_Assistance.  If it's something more technical then it may be best to do the latter as other people are better with those things.--ЗAНИA [[Image:Flag_of_Estonia.svg|15px]]talk 11:03, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks, that's the link I wanted. Is there an IRC channel and such too? Actually, just point me in the direction of what ever Wikibooks uses for an Admin handbook, and I can read from there. Many Thanks! // Fra nkB 16:23, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
 * The IRC channels can be found on Contact_us. There is usually somebody in the channels but not sure how quick their responses might be.  Not sure about an Admin handbook - I'm sure there was one once.  All I can find is Administrators but it's not very detailed.--ЗAНИA [[Image:Flag_of_Estonia.svg|15px]]talk 20:39, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Senate Bean Soup
You need a recipe for this important soup in the Cookbook. I am not a wikibooks contributor (I do Wikipedia instead) so I leave it to you. Best regards. 2601:4:4D80:5C7:8137:D55E:7A9D:6EE7 (discuss) 18:04, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I don't think Xania knows that recipe. --goldenburg111 (talk) 20:17, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
 * . If you google it, three are lots of variants.  Great soup. Uses Michigan beans.  Should also link back to the wikipedia article.2601:4:4D80:5C7:C934:B886:9504:B2DA (discuss) 11:31, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Well, Wikibooks can be edited by anyone. If you feel so strongly about it, perhaps you should choose your favorite version and put it up there yourself? Chazz (talk) 16:10, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
 * As Chazz has already said, if you want the recipe added then just add it: Cookbook:Senate Bean Soup. I don't know much about such a recipe so it would be best if somebody familiar with the food would create the recipe page.  Just make sure that you don't copy and paste it from a copyrighted website.--ЗAНИA [[Image:Flag_of_Estonia.svg|15px]]talk 20:51, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikibook SQL
Thanks for the correction of Case Expression‎. I'm writing the 'Standard Track' of this book. But as I'm not a native english speaker, I am pleased to get some help concerning the english wording and spelling. We have seen that there are a lot of typos. Maybe you can edit some more pages? --Kelti (discuss • contribs) 07:42, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for your kind message.
I like messing around. I hope I am the least informed of your contributors. Pittsburgh Poet (discuss • contribs) 22:09, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Solitaire card games
Thank you for fixing up mistakes in my book. The reason I am amking this book is because there are a lot of pages on Wikipedia that sould belong here, please see w:Category:52-card deck solitaire card games. And you can help me import here if you like. I am also new here, if there are any mistake I've made, or anything I haven't done, please let me know --TheChampionMan1234 (discuss • contribs) 22:11, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

New to wikibooks!
Thank you for welcoming me to wikibooks! I am a little confused on how this all works...In terms of referencing, the majority of the ideas I am referring to are from the same author, so do I only reference him once, or do I reference each idea with the correlating page number to his book? Probably a really obvious answer, just not too sure how to go about it! Also, is there a specific format in which books are supposed to be presented? Thank you again!! Kristddd (discuss • contribs) 22:18, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Review edits
Plz review this edit, Thanks :) --Muhammad Shuaib (discuss • contribs) 09:07, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I have now reviewed the edits but it is not necessary for edits to be reviewed on this page. Changes are automatically visible by anybody.--ЗAНИA [[Image:Flag_of_Estonia.svg|15px]]talk 13:16, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
 * So why has this extension been enabled? :) --Muhammad Shuaib (discuss • contribs) 14:09, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I believe it is so that it is clear which pages have or haven't been reviewed for vandalism. However, a small number of pages - mainly Wikijunior and other paged intended for younger people - will only show the reviewed versions of the pages.--ЗAНИA [[Image:Flag_of_Estonia.svg|15px]]talk 19:17, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

cu nom
Checkuser noms should be widely advertised. They're somewhat wider than the project. You should probably ask QuiteUnusual about how widely; but I suspect at least an announcement in a reading room and something to a mailing list would be appropriate. --Pi zero (discuss • contribs) 16:45, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Will do. I put the site notice on as that was what QU did for his CU nomination.  Looking at the archives it seems he also tried a watchlist notice but with little effect.  I'll add the reading room notice shortly.--ЗAНИA [[Image:Flag_of_Estonia.svg|15px]]talk 17:08, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
 * How do I go about this mailing list thing? I didn't even know there was a mailing list.  I had a look around the site and found something about a Wiki textbook newsletter but I assumed that this was something very out-of-date considering the name.--ЗAНИA [[Image:Flag_of_Estonia.svg|15px]]talk 19:13, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Aye, there's the rub. I always figured there must be a mailing list &mdash; every project has one &mdash; but had never gotten around to subscribing.  Turns out it's called textbook-l, and can be subscribed to (as I now have) at
 * https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/textbook-l
 * Having only just subscribed, I don't actually know there isn't a bunch of traffic on it; but if I hadn't gotten around to it, and you weren't aware of it... well, one could try it and see what happens. --Pi zero (discuss • contribs) 20:53, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Well I subscribed and sent a message to the mailing list almost a day ago but I haven't received anything (unless it excludes the sender from receiving).--ЗAНИA [[Image:Flag_of_Estonia.svg|15px]]talk 11:29, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I received the message you sent, so it may indeed exclude the sender. And somewhat thereafter Thenub314 voted, whom I hadn't seen around here just lately, so I wondered if they might have been on the list.  --Pi zero (discuss • contribs) 11:44, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
 * OK that's good to know. It might also have not included me as I had only just subscribed so maybe wasn't yet included in the list.--ЗAНИA [[Image:Flag_of_Estonia.svg|15px]]talk 11:48, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
 * When you subscribed, you should (if you used the technique I did) have received an email asking you to confirm the subscription. I believe you're actually added to the list when you respond to that.  --Pi zero (discuss • contribs) 12:58, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes I did and I confirmed it all. I suspect that the actual mailing list is maybe only updated once a day so I wasn't included in the email which I sent.  Or, as I suggested above, maybe the sender of an email is excluded from the list of recipients.--ЗAНИA [[Image:Flag_of_Estonia.svg|15px]]talk 13:46, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
 * It is the lowest traffic list I'm subscribed to. I got your mail via the list - and it is the only one I've seen in 2014. There are about 3 mails a year. QuiteUnusual (discuss • contribs) 08:18, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Interview to help us with Master Thesis?
Hi Xania,

We are two students doing our M.Sc. thesis about motivational factors to contribute with Open Educational Content and we need people to interview. We were wondering if you would like to help us? The interview won't take long and we can do it over Skype. Interested? Please send me an e-mail me at ottve507@student.liu.se or leave us a reply here.

We would be really happy if you choose help us!

Regards Otto
 * Hi Xania,

Please block OXp1845, because it looks like he is posting spam in a place where it is not tolerated.--TheChampionMan1234 (discuss • contribs) 02:16, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Do you think so? The user posted the interview request to six people (including the three of us).  If they'd asked two people it surely wouldn't be spam.  If they'd asked a hundred it surely would be.  Where do you think the line should be drawn?  Since only six people were contacted, perhaps you'd be better off leaving them a polite note?  --Pi zero (discuss • contribs) 02:35, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I agree with the above. I don't see any spam.  --ЗAНИA [[Image:Flag_of_Estonia.svg|15px]]talk 10:19, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes, please don't block me! You don't need to agree to be interviewed if you don't want. I just needed some help with my master thesis... OXp1845 (discuss • contribs) 09:20, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Don't worry, I won't. I would help with the interview if I could but I don't live in a country with fast enough Internet speeds for Skype, video streaming, etc.--ЗAНИA [[Image:Flag_of_Estonia.svg|15px]]talk 10:33, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
 * We wouldn't really need video for this conversation, just audio would do fine! OXp1845 (discuss • contribs) 13:25, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

RFP
Thought this might help. When you get at least 25 supports, you'll need to make a request at Meta to have the CheckUser bit assigned. Before it can be assigned, you'll need to follow the instructions on identifying to the Foundation that can be found linked to from the Identification Noticeboard. Once this is done a member of the Foundation staff will add you to the Noticeboard, and then a Steward will add the rights, and ask a CU list admin to add you to the CheckUser mailing list, the CheckUser wiki and the IRC channels if you want to use them. This will take a few days end to end. The Steward applying the rights will examine the voting carefully so again expect some delays! QuiteUnusual (discuss • contribs) 17:41, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the info. I'd already checked out the blurb about it all on Meta and it did seem like a long process.  If the support gets above 25 or 26 then I'll start following the instructions.--ЗAНИA [[Image:Flag_of_Estonia.svg|15px]]talk 19:14, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Congrats. The rights have been set by my colleague Mentifisto. I've send you an email as well; please look at it and send me a reply and I'll help you further. :) Trijnstel (discuss • contribs) 20:46, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I've replied.--ЗAНИA [[Image:Flag_of_Estonia.svg|15px]]talk 20:54, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Congrats. --Pi zero (discuss • contribs) 21:24, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Welcome to the team. I am sure in about 30 mins after you've looked at the tools you'll be better then I ever was, but if you have any questions let me know. Thenub314 (talk) 00:32, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks y'all.--ЗAНИA [[Image:Flag_of_Estonia.svg|15px]]talk 01:14, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Help
Hi :) I have become active on urdu wikibooks, and would like to enchance it from scratch. May you help me?

Recently I have one problem, in this page, side templates which indicate versions of book (pdf, print etc) dont look like in this page in enwikibooks. --Muhammad Shuaib (discuss • contribs) 17:17, 29 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Hi, I'm not too sure. I'm not very technical but it appears that Template:Print Version is slightly different on en.wikibooks and ur.wikibooks.  I'd suggest going to Template:Print version and directly copying the contents of that content over to here.  If this doesn't work you could leave a message on User:QuiteUnusual's talk page as he is more technical.--ЗAНИA [[Image:Flag_of_Estonia.svg|15px]]talk 20:30, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
 * It is made more difficult for us to assess as urwiki uses right to left text direction, which makes the rendering unreliable. QuiteUnusual (discuss • contribs) 07:25, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks friends for concern, Now problem is solved :) Muhammad Shuaib (discuss • contribs) 08:37, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

User:ChassidDYQ
Hi, this page is spam - I see you weren't sure. This type of user page (often known as a NTSAMR spam) is common across all projects. If you CheckUser the account there's a common pattern that can be seen that helps identify it. In addition, if you look at CentralAuth to view the account you'll see there's no account on login.wikimedia.org which is a red flag that it is a spambot QuiteUnusual (discuss • contribs) 07:31, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I had suspected as much. Thought I had CU'ed it but when I logged in yesterday evening (21.00 UK time) there was so many edits, so much spam, all types of things - busy day.  Any idea about the point of such spam?  It's often gone within minutes well before any chance of being indexed by search engines, nobody clicks on the links, it all just seems even more pointless than regular spam.--ЗAНИA [[Image:Flag_of_Estonia.svg|15px]]talk 09:57, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Indeed, utterly pointless. We get it across all the projects, spot it in minutes and lock the accounts but they just carry on. QuiteUnusual (discuss • contribs) 07:19, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for your assistance
Dear Xania,

Thanks for your assistance with my proposed edits to the cookbook. I thought I would mention in advance that I hope begin a process to distinguish Texas cuisine from Tex-Mex cuisine and, to that end, hope to adjust the majority of the recipes in the 'Texan cuisine' category to be in the Tex-Mex cuisine category and to categorize other existing recipes as being 'Texas cuisine'. I apologize if this is not the right place in which to mention these matters. Do not hesitate to let me know if there is a more appropriate forum.

Best Regards,

Austncorp (discuss • contribs) 13:41, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Sounds a good idea. I added the recent recipes to Tex-Mex category as it was the only one I could find.  I really have no idea about such cuisines -in fact I didn't even know the adjective for a dish from Texas (I initially thought it was Texasine or Texasish).--ЗAНИA [[Image:Flag_of_Estonia.svg|15px]]talk 18:58, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

The Computer Revolution
Dear Xania,

Thank you for doing so much to make Wikibooks better.

One thing mystifies me. Recently you added the sentence "This page should be written." to the top of a page.

Huh? That page has been written. That page is not finished, but what page at Wikibooks is ever finished? --DavidCary (discuss • contribs) 08:38, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Normally I forget why I did whatever action I did but as this was just yesterday my memory is fresh. I should have written re-written, not written.--ЗAНИA [[Image:Flag_of_Estonia.svg|15px]]talk 08:58, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Reviewer
Hello Xania,

I can see that you have been reviewing most of the edits on Wikibooks, and can also see that or rather I would say that you are the only active admin out here. I wanted to understand few things stated here, about the Automatic criteria for Reviewer.

The points are: 1. 5 or more edits are in recent changes at the time automatic reviewer promotion is checked (this works out to be anytime in the past week). 2. 10 or more unique pages are edited at least once. 3. 8 edits are spaced 2 or more days apart from each other (which takes at least 14 days, if you edit every 2 days).

Oh and also, how can I have the reviewer tool, if I have never been granted reviewer access.↓
 * Have never been blocked, and have never had the reviewer tools removed (you can request the tools if otherwise).

If you can assist me in this, I would be grateful.

Danke. Vishal Bakhai - Works 21:00, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi, I am quite active at the moment but there are at least two other active admins at present. I don't understand the point you were asking.  The list about 5 or more edits in recent changes, etc. is all correct.  The criteria for Reviewer was created so that reviewers have a diverse range of edits on the site rather than just editing their user page 100 times, constant minor edits on one book, etc.  By fulfilling the criteria a Reviewer probably has plenty of experience at Wikibooks.  It usually takes 1-2 months depending on how often you are online, etc.  Alternatively users can request Reviewer flag at Requests for permissions --ЗAНИA [[Image:Flag_of_Estonia.svg|15px]]talk 11:07, 11 May 2014 (UTC)


 * No no. What I meant to ask was something else. However, now I have re read (paying attention) and understood the criterion's. Can you advice me, when I might ask for a Reviewer Flag for myself, as I wish to assist as much as I can, apart from providing my own edits, which are currently at German Language. Oh, I really liked the way you have showcased your page, and the signature. I have tried few of the things you have done, on my own page. I really liked it. :) Danke. Vishal Bakhai - Works[[Image:Flag_of_India.svg|15px]] 11:41, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
 * You can ask at any time on the RfP page. If you have a good history here and on another Wikimedia site it will likely be granted.  Feel free to copy or use the signature but beware that some Wikimedia sites (Wikipedia, I think) don't allow graphics in signatures.--ЗAНИA [[Image:Flag_of_Estonia.svg|15px]]talk 12:02, 11 May 2014 (UTC)


 * I don't think for the time being I would ask for it, as I have just started editing again. As such I had started using WP from somewhere around the year 2005-06(When I did not have any user ID). However, due to many constraints, I have not been active till this year, and yes, I have committed mistakes, also on Wikipedia, but I am learning, and I am not repeating the errors anymore (hopefully). I actually just copied the rack template from your page, as that was something which I liked. I am currently editing the German book, and if there is anything, you think, I am doing incorrect, kindly let me know, and if you can also let me know of the way I am progressing, given your time here, and experience you have. Danke. Vishal Bakhai - Works[[Image:Flag_of_India.svg|15px]] 12:33, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

You Tube Links.
Hi I am unsure of whether we can accept any social media links here as citations? Like say You tube, or Flickr, or FaceBook etc. Even Vogue in fact for in that matter? Please see the citation here at ICT, which has provided a You Tube link. Also thisYou Tube one.
 * I don't think there's any policy against sources and links to Youtube. They seem a really good idea.  I would avoid Facebook links as links and sources should only be made for sites where registration isn't necessary.  Ciatations are not needed on Wikibooks as much as on Wikipedia.  Most books don't have many.--ЗAНИA [[Image:Flag_of_Estonia.svg|15px]]talk 18:43, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
 * That is what I was thinking too, when I was unable to locate any guide on it. I propose few thibgs:


 * Start with citations, wherever feasible, since all the books cannot have sources always. Like the German book that I am currently editing, is being done from my own notes, which I have with me.
 * There should be a guide and rule for citations.
 * External links should not be of Social sites or blog sites, except for some verified ones like govt. sites or say Microsoft site, etc.,
 * If possible inlines can be cited, but not at a cost of server load. I would not want WB to suffer any loads as this is a far far better project than the current WP.

Please let me know what you think of this so that we can put this forward. Danke. Vishal Bakhai - Works 19:01, 17 May 2014 (UTC)


 * (edit conflict) See the question How do I cite sources or include references? in Wikibooks for Wikimedians, and also Manual of Style for how Wikibooks differs from Wikipedia. What external links to include is left up to book contributors, and when there is disagreement through consensus discussion on the book's relevant discussion page. --dark lama  19:08, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
 * I am inclined to be against any new policies and rules. Wikibooks doesn't need more fixed rules and policies and it's probably the biggest problem with Wikipedia today.  On Wikipedia it is very hard to argue one's opinions in VfD, RfA, etc. when the idea on Wikipedia seems to be that the be heard you must quote lots of policies (according to BLG, FFT and My Hamster).  As Wikibooks is a collection of books it should be left for those working on each book to decide how they want to structure their book - Wikipedia is one book (an encyclopaedia), Wikibooks is thousands of books.--ЗAНИA [[Image:Flag_of_Estonia.svg|15px]]talk 20:23, 17 May 2014 (UTC)


 * I agree with both of you, as I see that both commons and wikipedia are bound on more warring and arguments, than anything else. However, the only reason I suggested was due to the fact that if all kinds of citations are provided, than there can be problems, however those can be rectified when reviewing, still. I agree too that wb is better with less hassle than others. I also believe that this place is for users who can assist others by making good stuff, and that anyways helps everyone. Good to all.

Vishal Bakhai - Works 01:43, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
 * P.S.: I hate what Wikipedia has become, with all sorts of bad things, and always having conflicts etc.
 * Danke
 * One of the four (or so) systemic woes of Wikipedia is a lack of common purpose. People pour enthusastic effort into writing artiles that other people then nominate for deletion on the grounds that they're beneath the dignity of an encyclopedia, or whatever; working at cross-purposes, anyway.  One great thing about Wikibooks is that the community naturally divides up neatly into groups (albeit small ones) with common interests, by book.  --Pi zero (discuss • contribs) 00:07, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Finding What Is Obvious
Where might I find info. about what to do about orphaned sections? Pittsburgh Poet (discuss • contribs) 23:32, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Orphaned sections of a book? If you feel that the page is no longer needed then you can add  .  If you think that others might disagree (maybe, on a very active book) then it would be best to add  to the page and then add a new section to the Requests_for_deletion page so that a discussion can take place to decide what to do.  Alternatively you could try to reincorporate the work into the book if it's possible.

The book Using Wikibooks has information about most aspects of Wikibooks and is useful for most things but for anything else it's best to ask an active editor or post a message in one of the Reading_rooms (all of the reading rooms are on admins' watchlists so any comments left there will be seen fairly quickly).--ЗAНИA talk 23:47, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

-- Thank you both. Pittsburgh Poet (discuss • contribs) 21:13, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Environmental theory and collection of ideas
You may wish to offer Fekarp, the main contributor, some advice/input at Reading room/General given the clean ups, queries, and speedy tags. --dark lama  20:03, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes, I plan to do that. Didn't notice the Speedy - that was supposed to be a Query.  I deliberately didn't tag every page for obvious reasons and part of the reason for tagging was for myself so that I can have a go at making some fixes later.--ЗAНИA [[Image:Flag_of_Estonia.svg|15px]]talk 20:26, 21 May 2014 (UTC)