User talk:Theresa knott

Hi Theresa, here's the page where we would like the picture to illustrate four 13-year-old friends going to the cinema KS3_Computing/Logic/Boolean Bnathyuw (discuss • contribs) 14:29, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

I LOVE your drawings ... you are going to make me get off my duff and do some of my own because I see how much they immediately add to the work. --Karl Wick

Theresa, what program are you using to make those drawings ? Just wondering .. Hey never mind, I just checked your user page on the main WP and saw that you have links and info about it .. you use MS Word ?? Interesting ... I hope you keep up the passion. --Karl Wick

Thanks, Theresa. You've really restored my confidence in the whole Wikibooks thing. I've encountered a lot of unwritten, poorly-written or excessively incomprehensible stuff, and what I see with GCSE Science is a breath of fresh air! Keep up the good work, it's of sufficient quality to actually see it competing with other major textbooks. Well done! --81.157.26.41 21:31, 6 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Theresa, sub-pages are any page that contains a '/' in the page name. Normally, a slash in the URL indicates a file structure or directory entry on the server. They were used a lot in Wikipedia, but have mostly been removed there. We've discussed them here as a possible way to solve the need for duplicate modules. Thus GCSE/Atomic Structure would be different than Physics/Atomic Structure. The Wikipedia approach would be to name these modules Atomic Structure in General Science, but this seems combersome. Another approach involvers the use of Namespaces. This would get things like GCSE:Atomic Structure.

There are a couple of us experimenting with things like automated table of contents and pop-up windows for footnotes or a glossary. When we get a good technique that works, we'll update or create a guideline page. In the meantime, most of us are just continuing whatever method a book started with. We know we'll have some cleanup when a good technique is settled on. Hope this explains some of whats going on. Keep up the good work, and I second Karl's praise for your illustrations. LouI 19:57, 1 Sep 2003 (UTC)

Covalent bonding
Hey Theresa, thanks for your edits on the organic subpages. This statement from Covalent bonding does not seem to be true tho: "Covalent bonds always occur in molecules that only have one type of atom". --Karl Wick

I was just looking at your science book. It sure is a large volume to cover. Do you plan on writing the whole thing ? I see your edits all of the time for quite some time now and yet the volume left to go is much larger than that which is done. I guess my book is the same tho, and when I finish ochem its on to other subjects .. Oh yeah, I hope you approve of the edit I did on the main science book page. --Karl Wick
 * It certainly is a large amount of work. If I do it all by myself on and off as the mood takes me it'll take maybe two or three years to complete. Still nothing worth doing is easy. What I hope will happen, when I get the electricity module really well done, a proper useable resource, then people might start actually using it. If that happens {well I should say when that happens) someone else may be inspired to write another module, Still if I have to do the whole thing myself I will. Oh and yes the edit on general science is good.Theresa knott 21:21, 18 Sep 2003 (UTC)

Evangelizing
By the way, I was talking up your page to a guy I ran into at work who is an eighth-grade teacher, saying how it is coming along and everything. He was pretty excited about it. As we get along farther on these things I think growth will accelarate. --Karl Wick

Admin
Theresa I want to nominate you to be an admin. I cant find the page tho.. --Karl Wick

Ochem
Looks nice ! --Karl Wick

We miss you
Hi Theresa, what's new. I haven't seen you around lately .. I hope you are not mad about my not understanding the meaning of GCSE or anything related. Are you taking a break ? Not giving up I hope. --Karl Wick

Welcome back Theresa !
I did miss you but am glad you were able to take a refreshing breather, and look forward to seeing you around these pages once again. --Karl Wick

Quiz maker tool
Teresa, are you familiar with this site ? http://javascript.about.com/library/tools/blquizmaker.htm

It writes quiz code for you so you can make dynamic Q&A's. Maybe we (you) could use it. --Karl Wick

Theresa - The main page was perfectly fine before (Statement not true about whatever size screen you have ~ I never had to scroll right left. Not sure what the proper sizing is, but the central contents area looks a bit squeezed now - Marsh 21:18, 4 Nov 2003 (UTC) I think the problem arises from that little box added at top right. -- Marsh

Theresa - I'm using IE. The html width % tags should adjust things for both individual browser and screen resolutioon settings (all things functioning perfectly). By adjusting the contents table to 80% it did get smaller on my screen, but everything else around (above and below) stayed the same (the tables are nested), so there was no right-left adjustment in text outside the colored contents box. Is it (on your browser) actually filling more than full screen width? Usually, that is caused by something forcing the width out of specified bounds (e.g., a line or graphic that is too large for screen setting, or something similar in essence overriding the percent width commands) - Marsh 22:55, 4 Nov 2003 (UTC)

I too am using IE. I think the problem that have is to do with the navigation frame on the L.H.S. of the page. (the one with the wikibooks logo) This takes up about 20% of the page width, so if the tables set at 100% the page will always be wider than the browser window. I don't see why we need to set a width at all really, so I've removed the width attributes entirely, letting the viewers browser decide how wide to make the table. Does this look ok to you ? Theresa knott 09:17, 5 Nov 2003 (UTC)

Did removing the Width=100% make any difference on your browserr? - Marsh 17:37, 5 Nov 2003 (UTC)
 * Yes it's cured the problem for me. Does it still look OK to you? Theresa knott 23:03, 5 Nov 2003 (UTC)
 * After I brought the three columns a bit closerr to same size, it looks fine on my screen, but only fills about 80% of the available space. If it was off screen with 100% setting on your monitor, then something must be forcing the layout wide (and the colored box table complies by filling 100% of "too big"); but I cannot see what that is.  Most suspicious is the longer titles in the book listings. That is all I can see that could overide settings as there are no wide graphics anywhere.  What does the French Wikibooks main page look like on your system?  It is fine on mine. - Marsh 00:49, 6 Nov 2003 (UTC)

About the picture of Paris, I took it on the french Wikipedia, in the article about Paris. Traroth 10:26, 5 Nov 2003 (UTC)
 * I see. I'll do the necessary editing then. Theresa knott 11:12, 5 Nov 2003 (UTC)

A belated thankyou for the image on Discrete mathematics:Functions and relations :) Dysprosia 10:27, 12 Nov 2003 (UTC)
 * You're very welcome :-) Theresa knott 11:35, 12 Nov 2003 (UTC)

Foundation or Higher?
As far as I know, there is no Foundation or Higher. It is law that schools (except public schools...) have to have balanced sciences.

There is Single Science, 6 modules, Double Science, 12 modules, or Seperate Sciences, 18 modules.

Single Science makes you do 6 modules in the 2 GCSE years and you recieve one grade (from * down to F/U/similar).

Double Science makes you do 12 modules in the 2 GCSE years and you recieve two identical grades (from ** down to FF/UU/similar). They can never be different so excelling in Chemistry will not get you very far.

Seperate Sciences (that's me!) is like taking a Biology, Physics and Chemistry GCSE. Each have 6 modules and you get three seperate grades.

What's Foundation and Higher? R3m0t 16:52, 5 Dec 2003 (UTC)

It's the paper you sit in many exam boards Foundation is balanced, you still get 12 modules for doulble science, but the papers omit the most difficult questions. You can get grades C downwards. The higher paper is gives grades A -D any lower than that you get a U. The paper sat is not specified on the final certificate though, A grade C For example can be got by sitting either paper and nobody but the candidate need know which paper was sat. Theresa knott 08:31, 7 Dec 2003 (UTC)

Algebra:Functions images
Thanks for those. The apple picture is great! I'm going to move the second illustration down from the relation section to the function part; any chance you could make another similar picture demonstrating a relation that's not a function (ie., at least one right-hand element points to more than one left-hand element)? That would really make the distinction clear. --Spikey 01:35, 18 Dec 2003 (UTC)

Hi T :) If you do intend on resizing the image yourself, you may want to simplify it just a little, it may be a bit complicated on sight to spot that it isn't a function - perhaps have the mapping 1->{2,3}, 2->3, 3->4, 4->4? Just a suggestion, really, no big deal if you don't wanna change it! :) Dysprosia 10:45, 20 Dec 2003 (UTC)

r3m0t and Science
*bows* Well thank you! Merely 14 years 4 months. r3m0t 07:19, 15 Jan 2004 (UTC)

I'm in year 10, doing Triple Science, AS Mathematics and I'm doing a Chemistry coursework this term. I already did Chemical Patterns, Chemistry in Action and Energy and Electricity and got three A*s (woohoo!). Also finishing Human Body unit and starting Waves, Atoms and Space. I'll try come along to the GCSE Science and help out when I can :) r3m0t 10:41, 16 Jan 2004 (UTC)


 * Well, so far I've done... um... let's see. I've done Chemical Patterns, Chemistry in Action, The Human Body, Inheritance and Survival, Energy and Electricity, Waves, Atoms and Space - that's all of Single Science. Also finished Health and Exercise and Chemicals of the Earth (I think that's it) in Double Science. Also currently doing Movement and Change, in Double, which I started on the 24th. I recieve my Chemistry coursework next week.
 * Well, this is going to sound really stupid, but... what do you need help with? :) I would much prefer Movement and Change because that's what I'm doing right now. PS We use Edexcel in this school. r3m0t (cont) (talk) 11:48, 26 Mar 2004 (UTC)
 * Well, I prefer Chemistry to Physics, so what the hell - I'll do Chemical Patterns, I think. Need to go find the syllabus thing. r3m0t (cont) (talk) 11:48, 26 Mar 2004 (UTC)

languages
Theresa, maybe its no big thing but I am so frustrated I want to rend my clothes. Let me cry on your shoulder ... sniff .. --Karl Wick

venn diagrams
Sure thing, Diagram Queen :) Just need some ideas for what to be shown in them, haven't had much time to think about the DM book for a while... Dysprosia 10:31, 3 Feb 2004 (UTC)

editing feature
Theresa, have you seen the feature where little boxes show up at the top of the editing box that let you do some formatting in one click ? I was on a friend's computer and these icons showed up that I had never seen, to make text bold or italic, among other things. Maybe it does not work on my Mac or something. Do you know what I am talking about ? It was an XP home edition machine that I saw it on, but the XP pro version work does not seem to support it. --Karl Wick

thanks
Thank you for your kind words. Your support means a lot to me. I will take your advice and will curtail my wikipedia time to make more time for wikibooks. Perl 13:09, 25 Mar 2004 (UTC)

BTW, Ill be in NEw york for a few days so I won't be able to contribute until Monday. Perl 13:13, 25 Mar 2004 (UTC)

thanks
Thanks for your work on the physics wikibook.

-- DavidCary

p.s.: are you looking for the book "The Magic Army" by Leslie Thomas http://www.fetchbook.info/The_Magic_Army.html ?

Yeah, that's a possibility. If he revert's again I'll use the babelfish or something :) Dysprosia 02:12, 4 Jul 2004 (UTC)

how to
forgive my ignorance but for the life of me i can't get the venus image to post from the wikipedia article over to the module. why is this? i was also thinking of bringing the tables from the articles explaining the planet stats. can you help me out maybe post a tutorial type of thing on my talk page here. sorry to bother you. oh and p.s. i look forward to working on this project with everyone, i beleive it will be a great success! --Larsie 16:50, 8 Nov 2004 (UTC)


 * It can't be done! (Which explains why you can't do it) However a new project called wikicommons has just been launched. This is a central repository for wikimedia pictures. I think you can get images from commons to display on any wiki, but I don't know for sure as I've never tried it. Take a look here and see if you can figure it out.

nasa
hey there would you be able to tell me where i can find info on how to bring the nasa image from the site to the module? --Larsie 18:16, 8 Nov 2004 (UTC)


 * Go to the NASA site and download the image onto your harddrive. (Clicking on the image and selecting "save as" should do it. Make sure you save it where you can find it again. Change the name if necessary; it should be descriptive. then click the upload button and navigate yo where the file is on your computer. Put the public domain tag in the summary and also add that it's from NASA then hit the upload button. Let me know if you have any problems. Theresa knott 20:10, 8 Nov 2004 (UTC)

i actually know how to format now it's just that i can't download images as i use my work pc for all my contributions so i don't have the ability to gather images and upload them, sorry. --Larsie 20:57, 8 Nov 2004 (UTC)

check out what i did for the venus category (the image showing venus in blue) is that ok or should i not do it like that. --Larsie 21:07, 8 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * No you can't do that. What you are doing is retreiving the image live from their website everytime you look at the page. This has two consiquences
 * If their website is down for any reason, or if they decide to move the image location or name, we'll see a "missing image" note instead.
 * Because the viewers browser fetches the image from thier website rather than ours, they have to pay for the bandwith rather than us. bandwith theft is considered extremely poor etiquette.

You best bet is to just put the url on the talk page and let someone else sort adding it to the page. Theresa knott 06:48, 9 Nov 2004 (UTC)

thanks for the heads up there theresa, appreciate it. --Larsie 17:14, 9 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Image:Inside_the_sun.PNG
I like this diagram. Could I have a go at it? I'd be happy to correct the typo. Also, I'd like to create a new version, under a different name. It would have the photosphere, chromosphere, and corona labelled. I see a comment here from Karl Wick that you create your images in MS Word. If that's true, I should be able to edit in MS Word, right? Could you upload the "original" picture file or a Word document with the picture file in it. I could download, work on them, and report back to you on what I've done with your baby. --SV Resolution 16:23, 23 August 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for responding to my message. I appreciate your invitation to re-use your image. I thought the original version -- in the format you had when you were editing it, before you saved it as a PNG -- would be better than the png, because it might have more bits. If I start working from a copy, I could just degrade the image. Thanks if you can enlighten me. --SV Resolution 00:52, 29 August 2005 (UTC)

Commons
If possible, add your those of your images that have no english-spesific labels to wikimedia commons. I've already added anode image there, and used it in finnish-language wikipedia article.

Copyright problem with Image:Electrolysis anode.png
--Derbeth 09:26, 6 October 2005 (UTC)

Duplicate account
What do you this should be done with your second account? I think it's ok to block it infinitely to avoid possibility that someone could break its password and uses as sockpuppet. --Derbeth talk 19:25, 25 April 2006 (UTC) A block on that account will trip the autoblocker when I log in with this one. I'm not sure blocking it is really necessary at all. If somone could break its password then they could probably break the paaword on this account too, and this one has admin privaledges! Theresa knott 20:09, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

Question
Hi THeresa! I just registered today, and I have a question about articles on Wikibooks. Are there cases here where blank pages are accepted? I saw European History/Chapter 14 was created today and saw that European History/Chapter 13 is in a similar vein. Just wondered because Chapter 13 seems to be several years old. Sjakkalle 11:30, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * I can't for the life of me see why someone needs to create a totally blank page. Books are different from encylopedias because they need to be structured. So obviosly chapter 13 should come before chapter 14 in the contents page, but once there is a link there I can't see a reason to actually create the page blank. I'll leave it a little while as the book is clearly being worked on (if not that chapter) and see what happens. Theresa knott 11:36, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

Process Control Wikibook
You left a note on the "Ellastic Collisions" page of the Process Control Wikibook. I am currently merging that old book into the new Control Systems book. I am copying the text verbatim from this page into the Discussion page. You mentioned that you had some issues with the text of the page, so let me know if this material is worth salvaging and moving to a better location, or if we should just delete it and start fresh. --Whiteknight (talk) (current) 20:21, 26 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Can you provide a link because I can't find the original page or my comments. Theresa knott 20:38, 26 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The current contents of the page are listed on the talk page of the control systems book here. The contents of the talk page are still available at Their original location, but I will soon move the talk information over, and delete the old talk page as well. --Whiteknight (talk) (current) 21:22, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

School Project
I'm probably going to be a TA next semester, and I was toying with the idea of offering my students extra credit for making (class-related) contributions to wikibooks. I saw your school project, and would very much like to know how well it is working out for your students, how easy it is to teach wikiformatting to people who may be completely unfamiliar with text markup etc. I think it's very admirable for you to be getting young people involved, not only in the learning process, but also in the teaching process as well. Kudos to you! --Whiteknight (talk) (current) 19:14, 4 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Well they seem to be enjoying it! I haven't actually taught much formatting at all; some of the brighter ones are picking it up for themselves. It's very easy after all, and the nice thing about a wiki is that someone else can always fix the formatting later.


 * You need to think carefully about safety. My pupils are all quite young, so I gave them a very stern talking to about how they are allowed to behave online, and i vetted their usernames etc. You also need to think about staff pupil relationships. If the pupils are teenagers I recommend that you create a seperate account for yourself for use in the project and keep you main account secret from them.


 * Thanks for your kind words, but children love to show off what they know. When the term ends I'm going to print up the pages and bind them together into a little booklet and give them a copy each to take home. Theresa knott 05:17, 5 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Good suggestions, all. Thanks, and good luck with your project. --Whiteknight (talk)(projects) 16:01, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

Naming convention
Please inform your students to obey our naming conventions. They mess up a little creating pages like "simple switch" (I have just deleted one thinking it is a vandalism). It's very simple, you just need to write  /pagename/  or  pagename  instead of  pagename . --Derbeth talk 08:57, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Yep I will, but they are young :-( What is easy for us is hopelessly complicated for a kid. Theresa knott 12:07, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Great!
So happy to have a contributor! The standards you suggest are right on the money. "key stage three" as you call it is exactly the same age group I was aiming for. As for science currently learned, It vairies from school to school but generally they will have had basic environmental science, weather, some geology, basic electricity, etc... In the USA, public school texts do not focus enough on laboratory experimentation as a form of learning. Because of this, i would like the book to have a large basis in experimentation, lab work and procedure, and careful observation as methods of learning material covered in the book, but also as preparation for high school science (ages 14-18) where this sort of analysis is required. I look forward to working with you! please feel free to edit any part of the book that you find a way to improve! Thanks for the offer! For more info about my ideas for the book, you can see the guide. Basejumper123 20:42, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

Standards
I found this guide to Massachussetts Science education standards at the state department website

Newbie friend
I have retired from my work at wikipedia. I have been told that wikibooks has a more pleasant atmosphere than en.wikipedia so I thought I would give it a chance. I know that you are a long-term wikibookian so I thought I would tell you I set up an account so you can watch out for newbie screw-ups, and maybe time permitting over any guidance or advice. Thanks. -JCarriker 08:30, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Your images
Here's the list of images you uploaded that are untagged. -- SB_Johnny | talk 09:09, 4 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Sorry for my delay in responding to you. You seem to have properly tagged all your images now, but I gladly would have done it for you if you had asked. We didn't mean to alarm you! See you around. --Whiteknight (talk) (projects) 13:57, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

Acetone peroxide synthesis
I have proposed the acetone peroxide synthesis for deletion. What do you think? Ewen 14:18, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Magnetic field of a current carrying wire.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Magnetic field of a current carrying wire.png. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikibooks because of copyright law (see Wikibooks' Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikibooks are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information or giving false information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Study help desk. Thank you. Az1568(Talk) 07:41, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Your De-Adminship
Hello. I would like to inform you that you will have your sysop rights removed here on 7 Feb 2008 due to inactivity. If you would like to discuss the matter, please see WB:RFA. You can re-apply for adminship at a later date if you wish. Thanks. -within focus 23:10, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

bsrboy
I didn't "add" the Swastika the next day. It was always there. It's been The Vandal Warrior's page for ages and no one mentioned it to me. When that user removed he didn't put a good enough reason for removing it, so I put it back and explained me reason, then he put it back still without any discussion, so I reverted it, then he blocked my user page and still didn't discuss it. Then I asked him why he did via email... No email reply and guess what? I got my email blocked! Great... I really was going to do as you said, but none of this would have happened, if he talked about it with me or maybe if you did... or if anyone did, rather than just getting blocked. It seems unfair to be blocked from email someone when all I did was ask him why he reverted it?! And still no reply! What's going on with Wikipedia. What happened to the politeness and respect I had for administrators? 86.29.128.62 (talk) 16:56, 14 May 2008 (UTC)