User talk:TheUg~enwikibooks

Hello and welcome to Wikibooks!

Here are some tips to help you get started:
 * You should sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;.
 * Remember to conduct any editing experiments in the sandbox.
 * If you're a Wikipedian, see Wikibooks for Wikipedians for a primer on how things work here (it's a little different).
 * If you want to base your work here on materials from Wikipedia, please use WB:RFI to bring the material over in compliance with the GFDL.
 * If you're an instructor and plan on using wikibooks for a class project, see Guidelines for class projects
 * Please say hello at the Staff Lounge with any questions or ideas.
 * Eventually, you might want to read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines.
 * Please take a look at Naming policy before starting a new book.
 * Remember to maintain a Neutral point of view.
 * Explore, be bold in editing pages, and have fun!

You will find more resources in Community Portal. If you want to ask a question, visit the Study help desk, the Staff lounge, IRC channel or ask me personally on my talk page. For site news, see the Bulletin board. It might be an idea if you add this page to your "watchlist" so that you can see when any new information is posted there.

Good luck!--Sundance Raphael 17:46, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

European History book
Hey there. You offer a lot of useful insight, and I agree with you on a lot of points, but the issue for me has simply been time. Being an undergraduate whose primary area of study is Business Administration leaves me with little time to keep up with and improve this book in the ways I'd like. The outline of this book follows the AP European History cirriculum to a tee, and the information has largely been contributed to and assessed by a former teacher of mine who studied European History at both the undergraduate and graduate level at Notre Dame.

In an attempt to keep the book comprehensive, I'd ask that you not remove any of the existing sections (such as Rasputin, which, as you noted was relatively unimportant yet is very interesting and in that sense has its purpose). Certainly, clarification and expansion would be excellent, and I'd be happy to help you as much as I can in doing so.

Thanks for your interest in the book, and I look forward to seeing your modifications to it. If you don't mind, please keep me posted, and like I said earlier, I'll try to help out as much as I can.

— Ultimadesigns 01:10, 16 January 2007 (UTC)


 * In terms of rush editing, moving or deleting — absolutely not, certainly. That’s why I am trying to discuss it beforehand.


 * I do understand time constraints as well, quite busy myself. Wikipedia-wise I’ve just started big fortification and military engineering project on Russian Wikipedia, so it will take time to organise, plus I’m in the middle of big Cossack research. Once it gets cleared out, I’ll be able to come back here and start to do something.


 * I also got a question about curriculum you’ve mentioned. Is it “AP” as in the “Associated Press” or some other? Is there link to take a look at it? TheUg 02:07, 16 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Sorry for eavesdropping. "AP" stands for "advanced placement", and is a term used to describe classes in secondary school that are university-level. AP classes in secondary school can typically count towards university credits as well. --Whiteknight (talk) (projects) 02:13, 16 January 2007 (UTC)


 * You can check out the standard cirriculum for the Advanced Placement European History at http://www.collegeboard.com/prod_downloads/ap/students/eurohistory/ap-cd-eurohist-0607.pdf. Remember, this book is primarily oriented toward people who have just begun delving into European History (i.e. those enrolled in an upper-level high school or introductory college European History course).  In that sense, it should be relatively simplistic and, perhaps most importantly, concise.  If you're looking to provide something more expansive or higher level, you might wish to create another Euro book for that purpose.

help requested
I have recently finished to write a book on m:b:en:Philosophy of Science in Russian wikibook Философия науки. I want to find somebody to translate it to English. Can you help me with this? P.S. I am interesting to write some books on math and computer science. On math I am currently working on m:b:ru:Знакомство с методом математической индукции and on computer science on Object oriented, m:b:en:Computer programming/Procedural programming and m:b:en:User:Alexsmail/Computer programming/How Objects should be correctly compared in Java (all this is on currently on hold). In my English texts I have a lot of grammar mistakes, so I need somebody to correct one. I want that all that I am writing will be on English. It can be translating of written on another language text or original text.

P.P.S. I have some material on math in Hebrew. Also hebrew wikibook has some material. It can be nice, while not mandatory, if you will know Hebrew too.

Я недавно закончил писать книгу в русском викиучебнике Философия науки. Я хотел бы найти кого-то ктобы перевёл бы его на английский m:b:en:Philosophy of Science. Не могли бы вы мне в этом помочь? P.S. Я хочу написать пару книг по математике и компьютерным наукам (программированию). По математике я начал работать над m:b:ru:Знакомство с методом математической индукции, а по компьютерным наукам над Object oriented, m:b:en:Computer programming/Procedural programming и m:b:en:User:Alexsmail/Computer programming/How Objects should be correctly compared in Java (пока я оставил это). Я пишу на английском со многими грамматическими ошибками, мне нужен кто-то, чтобы их исправлять. Я хочу, чтобы все мои книги были на английском. Это может быть как перевода с другого языка, так и оригинальный, изначально написанный на английском текст. P.P.S. По математике, у меня часть материала на иврите, да и в ивритском викиучебнике можно взять. Было бы прекрасно, если бы вы владели также ивритом. Но вовсе не обязательно. alexsmail 16:02, 26 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Ох, извините, давно не заходил, не видел ваших сообщений. Наверное, уже не актуально? :) TheUg (talk) 05:53, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called TheUg. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name TheUg~enwikibooks that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 23:47, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 05:35, 19 April 2015 (UTC)