User talk:Sprowberry

Feedback for Wikibooks Portfolio
This is a very good piece of work that tackles a lot of relevant issues.

A post of this standard corresponds to the following grade descriptor:

Outstanding. In addition to the criteria for 70%+, entries at this standard demonstrate outstanding critical understanding of the exercise and are able to produce sophisticated lines of argument, and is highly original.

FMSU9A4marker (discuss • contribs) 14:14, 15 March 2016 (UTC) on behalf of sprowberry

Feedback for Wikibooks Portfolio
Second test

A post of this standard corresponds to the following grade descriptor:

Poor. Among other things, poor entries may just offer links without real comment or apparent point. They may offer nothing more than poor-quality synopsis or description of material of dubious relevance. They may have serious clarity problems (including dead links, random graphics) which affect comprehension (or even worse, admin warnings or take-down notices for copyright infringement). They might be off-topic, private trivia, or of unclear relevance. The wiki markup formatting will be of a poor standard.

FMSU9A4marker (discuss • contribs) 14:14, 15 March 2016 (UTC) on behalf of sprowberry

feedback template
Hi wondering if you can click here on sandbox to cut n paste? It should, but if the link doesn't work, I'll shift to your user discussion page b:User:GregXenon01/sandbox GregXenon01 (discuss • contribs) 17:03, 17 March 2016 (UTC)