User talk:Sean Heron

Imamat
If you look at the VfD page you will see that User:Whiteknight drew this to a conclusion. It would be better to approach him about this page rather than taking the impending doom off that he requested -- Herby talk thyme 14:20, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your hint, but I do not see why any single user should "draw this to a conclusion". I know I haven't done anything yet, but I've been sidetracked ;). Will get on the job momentarily. Regards Sean Heron 14:43, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
 * He is a bureaucrat here - as such he was drawing the debate to a close -- Herby talk thyme 14:58, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Oh :) . Still, (OK I must admit I'm new here and so may be mistaken) at least on wikinews/ wikipedia, admins or bureacrats, exept for their operating powers (deleting pages, blocking users, etc.) are not seen as having more or less weight in a disscusion than anyone else. Well, thats not quite true I guess, they are often seen as having extra influence, but not in the sense that their word is the end of discussion. There's no hurry to delete after all, and I had assumed the reason people where saying it should be deleted (including Whiteknight) was because it was apparent that nobody would put any effort into it (and that has changed now, yes ?). Kind regards Sean Heron 16:15, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Nope but they do end VfDs (or AfD in wp) -- Herby talk thyme 16:36, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

On wikibooks, an administrator or a bureaucrat doesn't get any extra authority in discussions, but I like to think i've been around long enough to know when to close a VfD. If you would like to try any make the Imamat book less POV, and more acceptable to wikibooks, you can certainly be given the opportunity to try. It's my opinion that it is better for the community to fix bad material then to delete it entirely. I'll remove the deletion notice from the page, you can do your best to fix the book, and hopefully this page won't be nominated for deletion again. --Whiteknight (talk) (projects) 18:03, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Will you continue your Imamat work?
There has been little activity on Imamat since your edits about a week ago. Will you return to this? If not, I am inclined to close the debate with "delete". --Swift 02:02, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
 * I had been thinking it was about time I got round to doing some more work on it :). I was glad to see when I checked by here yesterday, that the article had not been deleted yet :D . I will be continuing work on Imamat however, I`ve found it more difficult than expected, and so I won't be making much headway fast I fear. Thanks for giving me the heads up instead of just deleting, anyway :D ! Regards Sean Heron 19:40, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Follow up to this. Take a look at Votes for deletion.  You will see that this has been "placed on hold" for a month.  I have to say that this is a new approach and it is still possible that others may object to it.  However if it "sticks" it does give you a clear month to work on this before it comes back for review (it will be early Jan I guess).  Hope this will help you -- Herby  talk thyme 13:24, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Thats perfect :). One month is about right for the time I might need to get round to doing it :/. Thanks for going out of your way for me :D . Regards Sean Heron 20:35, 1 December 2006 (UTC)