User talk:PanosKratimenos/sandbox/BASC001/2020-21/Thursday2-3/History

An interdisciplinary approach between Architecture and biology
I have taken the liberty to include a short paragraph about an architectural movement Art Nouveau as it is an example of what you had described regarding the interplay between Architecture and Biology. I was inspired to add this as I found the first paragraphs very engaging as they highlighted an example of interdisciplinary work between the artistic side of architecture and biology, two disciplines which some would consider to be opposing regarding the art against science aspect. However, with the examples that you presented we can see that when these two disciplines collide and work together, this can result in the creation of beautiful and unique styles of architecture hence, producing new, creative knowledge. MM.Mar 08 (discuss • contribs) 11:46, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Thank you so much for your contribution. When I finished that section I felt like it was missing something more related to the artistic side of architecture but I couldn't think of anything. I feel like your contribution summarizes perfectly what I wanted to add and closes my article perfectly. Cannedtomatoes (discuss • contribs) 20:40, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

History of Forensic Science: The Use of Fingerprint Classification and Identification in the Conviction of Criminals
I have added a short section below this article, capturing how Fingerprint analysis is used today and the research it prompted into Biometrics. The sections above these two little paragraphs, describe how Fingerprint analysis helped Forensic Science grow as a discipline in the past, and I felt that an insight into how it may impact our future, would further help demonstrate how valuable this paradigm shift was. The method helped Biometrics start, gain recognition, and effectively grow, and with this short section I wanted to show that Fingerprint analysis is no longer just relevant to the forensic sciences and judiciary system. Bienchen4338 (discuss • contribs)

Thank you for your contribution. I found the idea you included of Biometrics extremely interesting as it highlights a modern application of Fingerprint analysis as well as, the interaction between the disciplines of biology, forensics and technology. The concept of Biometrics provides a good example of how interdisciplinary research can help develop concepts/methods that have existed for a long time, such as fingerprint analysis, into other techniques/concepts with completely unique and revolutionary applications. MM.Mar 08 (discuss • contribs) 10:32, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

History of marketing
I added a subsection on this topic about the history of marketing and consumer psychology, explaining how it emerged as a sub-discipline within marketing and the effects on marketing in general in its approach and methodology. I think it is a significant area within marketing, as it is now very heavily utilised in advertisement with an emphasis on consumer behaviour, so I believe it was an interesting and important area to elaborate on. Alpacamaka (discuss • contribs) 16:29, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

History of Ethics as a Branch of Philosophy
I just made a structural edit positioning the notes after your contribution instead of before, and included your references within the general notes section. I feel like this suits the page more in terms of structure - tell me if you think this is better. Alpacamaka (discuss • contribs) 17:11, 03 November 2020 (UTC)

I have added some subheadings to this contribution, to give it a bit more structure and show how the article progresses systematically. Please let me know if these titles are appropriate and accurately reflect the content of your paragraphs you wanted to highlight. (Bienchen4338 (discuss • contribs) 16:40, 10 November 2020 (UTC))

History of Obstetrics and Midwifery: how social construct and religious beliefs delayed their development into medical sub-disciplines
I added titles and subheadings to your section because I noticed you had divided it into very clear separate paragraphs, and I thought that adding them to the section would make it look clearer and intelligible. Let me know what you think of the ones I chose and feel free to change them if they do not suit the information in that paragraph. Cannedtomatoes (discuss • contribs) 13:33, 10 November 2020 (UTC)


 * The headings fit perfectly. They allow for an easier overview of my contribution and explicitly demonstrate how the article progresses. I really appreciate this addition - thank you for giving my contribution a more visible structure. (Bienchen4338 (discuss • contribs) 13:40, 10 November 2020 (UTC))

History of Evolutionary Biology
Under 'Evolutionary thought throughout history' I added '19' to what you had put as '80s' to make it '1980s' as I thought that this made it more precise. Let me know if this was not what you intended, or if you disagree. 12Tig (discuss • contribs) 16.31, 15 November 2020 (UTC))