User talk:Nicola.georgiou/sandbox/Approaches to Knowledge/Seminar group 13/ Evidence

Evidence within Art History
I uploaded the picture of Van Gogh Starry Night, I hope that's okay!

I'm guessing that the picture of Picasso you are referring to is Guernica. I found a picture on Wiki Commons but it's not focused on the painting. I'll upload it here and you can tell me if you would like to see it in your article.

By the way in your last paragraph, one of the links doesn't work > it loads up a page that says 'bad title'

Xx Alwayslearningmore (discuss • contribs)
 * Hello, thank you for the picctures it really adds to the article nicely. Also, thank you for pointing out the links that didnt work, I have now fixed then so they should all be fine. The only problem I am having is in uploading the picture of Guernica as I dont know how to do it, I would appreciate it if someone who knows how to do it could add it to the section. Thank you.Ethan.dawson101 (discuss • contribs) 16:15, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Digital Evidence
Hello MacabreRoses, I enjoyed reading your entry and saw you mentioned the new challenges that have arisen within Law since the development of digital evidence. I was wondering whether you might care to place more emphasis on the relation between a discipline (Law, most likely) and digital evidence. What does Law consider to be evidence? How then, is digital evidence relevant to Law's vision of evidence? Unadorablemensonge (discuss • contribs) 15:38, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Hello Unadorablemensonge! I am delighted to know that you enjoyed reading my entry this week! I also find the questions you posed very interesting; however, my entry is mainly focused on the definition of "digital evidence" as well as the challenges it may present, and consequently - the interdisciplinary solutions required. Focusing mainly on the relationship between "law" and "digital evidence" would change the entire concept of my contribution, making its focus something completely different from what I intended it to be. Also, as you might have noticed, the page has an entire section "The Law of Evidence" - dedicated to the relationship between Law and evidence, as well as to what is, in fact, considered evidence in a legislative context. Focalising on the subject in a second category might prove to be repetitive and could make the page in its entirety look less coordinated. Macabre Roses (discuss • contribs) 17:04, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

EBM - Evidence-based medicine
Hello, I thought this article was very clear, precise and well organised. I think it was easy to read for anyone whithout any specific knowledge of the subject. However, I was thinking of adding a reference to the second sentence which stated that EMB has philosophical roots. I hope this helps !

Thank you so much for your feedback, I am glad you were able to understand it easily! I will add the reference.

Introduction and Conclusion
Hello everyone! Last week we received an email from our seminar leader, suggesting that and introduction and a conclusion would be a great addition to our page as a whole. If anyone who hasn't written a contribution yet, finds it interesting, they could try to unify the content of the page by leading the reader into it with an introduction and eventually writing a short conclusion.Macabre Roses (discuss • contribs) 17:34, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
 * I have charged myself with the introduction, and I kindly ask someone to conclude. Macabre Roses (discuss • contribs) 00:23, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi! Thank you for your contribution, the introduction effectively leads into the rest of the article. I have just added a conclusion, which I hope will tie the page together. Unadorablemensonge (discuss • contribs) 11:23, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks so much both for the introduction and conclusion! They both read really well and I think tie the whole page together nicely. Edgeofdawn (discuss • contribs) 11:34, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you for writing the conclusion! It is coming together nicely this week. Macabre Roses (discuss • contribs) 17:13, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Structure
Hi! I'm not quite sure why the titles under evidence within disciplines have been put within quotation marks so I've removed them. If there's a reason why they're there I'm happy to change it back! Bfevidal (discuss • contribs) 11:16, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
 * I've also switched the titles to non-italicised because I'm not sure if it's supposed to be like that Bfevidal (discuss • contribs) 11:20, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Hello, I'm not sure why they were italicised either, but I do think that if we do not italicise under Evidence in Different Disciplines, we should remove the italics in the other parts as well for it to be more consistent. I will attempt to change that now, and am happy to listen to any other suggestions towards ameliorating the overall structure of the page. (i.e. if certain parts should indeed be italicised, or changed to a different format) Unadorablemensonge (discuss • contribs) 11:27, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Evidence in Cartography
Hi I really enjoyed this specific contribution to the article. I found the little introduction and justification of Cartography as a discipline very needed and clear. I think that the reason why I enjoyed this paragraph so much is how it manages to really confuse the distinction that has been created between qualitative and quantitative evidence. As in because, ultimately cartography uses quantitative measurements and distances to create maps, however the use of these qualitative information then goes through a subjective process of selection where the appropriate data is used and presented in a map depending on what it’s purpose, as you clearly state with the Mercator Project being a sailing map. Thus, we get a more complex synergy between qualitative and quantitative evidence, showing how it all is not just black and white. However, my question regarding this paragraph is the idea of maps as primary or secondary evidence and how could we classify them in any of these two categories since they are technically both?Ethan.dawson101 (discuss • contribs) 14:45, 9 November 2020 (UTC)