User talk:Misza13

Template:Bot
I noticed this template you created today. Actually we already got eg: --dark lama  19:07, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Kinda ugly, if you ask me... :-/ I'll think of a way to merge them... &mdash;Миша 13 19:34, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
 * It's an old template, please upgrade it if you think it needs to be upgraded. If you can't tell, we don't have too many bots around here (yet). --Whiteknight (Page) (Talk) 23:13, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Bot Active?
Is your bot active now? I want to start setting up some of the templates and get some archiving going on. --Whiteknight (Page) (Talk) 23:13, 10 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Not yet - I didn't have computer access for the last 6 or so days and am now catching up - should however set it up within a day. You can start setting up the configuration templates in advance, however. Миша 13 20:06, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Hmm... I see you have st up a few already. Are you sure you want all the various Reading room subpages archived into one common archive? Just checking up if it's really what you want, plus I'll have to generate the secret keys mentioned in the instructions. Миша 13 20:10, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
 * That's the way we've always done it. The "Reading Room" used to be a single page instead of multiple discussion pages, so when we made sub-pages, we kept all the archives together. I think that the important thing is that links to the various archives are kept at Reading room/Archives for reference, but those links can be easily updated no matter where the actual pages are located. If it's easier to use sub-page archiving, we can probably do it that way instead. --Whiteknight (Page) (Talk) 20:58, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
 * The bot just had a test run. However, I noticed that archives created were both date-based as well as counter-based. Special:Contributions/MiszaBot - was this intended? Миша 13 20:29, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
 * We're still working out the details, so everything is fine on your end. We will figure out how we want the archives to be done. Everything looks good, as far as I can tell. Thanks! --Whiteknight (Page) (Talk) 21:42, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

bot template
There's no reason we can't have 2. I like the old one better, so I spruced it up a bit with the fancy linkage, and restored User:Mike's bot account to use. Thanks for your effort though. – Mike.lifeguard  &#124; talk 21:10, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

Regarding "Wikibooks:Reading room/Administrative Assistance" bot activities
In regard to the recent history of "Wikibooks:Reading room/Administrative Assistance", I have noticed that the bot removed threads but never archived them and is removing pending actions (actions expecting closure from administrators) if the bot can't comply with this distinction (it will be hard to make a exclusion for the rules), the best approach will be restraining it from acting on pages were closing issues must require human intervention (like it is done on the VfD page), I haven't checked any other edits the bot has made on this page but it is possible that the archive is corrupted (missing some posts). --Panic (talk) 20:03, 4 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Ok problem partially solved (found the archives and added them to the archives menu), what is the pont of archiving if the pages aren't made known to Wikibookians ? Anyway is there an option to prevent a thread from being archived ? Txs --Panic (talk) 20:16, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Moved some non archived threads to November 2007 archive page also... --Panic (talk) 22:43, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

Key needed
Please provide us with a key for Reading room/Proposals, as it appears that someone copied it from the general reading room. It should be archiving to the same location as the other reading rooms, so we won't be archiving to a subpage and therefore need a key. Thanks. – Adrignola talk 20:04, 12 July 2010 (UTC)