User talk:Kpjas

Hey Kpjas, thanks for the work on Othello. Was it hard ? Can we expect more Shakespeare plays to follow ? Did you have to write the script yourself ? --Karl Wick

If a blessing is all you need and mine is good enough, then go for it ! It took me quite some time to do just one scene of Othello by hand. A little bit of noise due to unexpected variations are no big problem for me; each modern version of Shakespeare's plays has variations due to editorial insight anyways. Any slight errors can be worked out over time, right ? Thanks for your help on this, I am very excited about the opportunities we will have to bring people together for learning. --Karl Wick


 * So what did you decide ? Are you going to go for it ? --Karl Wick

Cool, with Macbeth I see you have not yet given up. Who do we have to talk to tho to enable the annotation feature ? --Karl Wick

Importing texts
Is it possible to use scripts to import other texts, such as the physics book that we started to import over to the site by hand ? It would certainly save a lot of tedious work. --Karl Wick

Protecting Shakespeare texts
Hello Kpjas,

I am feeling very tired with deleting the vandalism on Romeo and Juliet. I cannot revert to your version, because I do not know how

This has been done on 2 acts (Act 3, Scenes 1 and 3) by at least 6 separate IPs, during the past 2 days (8-9 June 2004).

Since you are the one who designed these pages (and will almost certainly have to retype Scene 3 of Act 3), would you consider protecting them?

Thank you very much,

EuropracBHIT 04:17, 9 Jun 2004 (UTC)

wikification of slovio
Great work! I'll continue writing the next lesson tomorrow :) --Dcabrilo 06:35, 19 July 2005 (UTC)

Re:Health science bookshelf
User:Mike.lifeguard has done a little bit of work over on the health sciences bookshelf. Specifically, the First Aid book was his masterpiece. I guess I don't really understand what kinds of problems you are talking about with copyright. What kinds of unforeseeable legal problems are you anticipating? We're pretty flexible, as long as you aren't straight copying content that doesn't belong to you. --Whiteknight (Page) (Talk) 23:05, 25 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Okay, I see what you are saying. That page you mentioned does look a little suspect, however going back a few revisions shows us a page that seems less likely to be problematic. If there is something you suspect is a copy+paste violation, do a best effort google search to double check. If things do go bad, we can try, in order of most disruptivity: (1) reverting to a clean revision on the page, (2) deleting the entire page but not the surrounding book, and finally (3) deleting the book. Things would have to be pretty bad, and obviously so, if we were going to resort to option #3.
 * If a page doesn't appear to be a copyvio, or if it appears so but you can't confirm it, or if nobody raises an allegation about it, don't worry about it. --Whiteknight (Page) (Talk) 22:46, 26 September 2008 (UTC)