User talk:Kathryn.rebecca42

Hello, welcome to Wikibooks!

You will find more resources in Community Portal. If you want to ask a question, visit the Study help desk, the Staff lounge, IRC channel or ask me personally on my talk page. For site news, see the Bulletin board. It might be a good idea to add this page to your "watchlist" so that you can see when any new information is posted there. You can do that by clicking the tab labeled "watch" at the top of the page.

If all that seems too much to wade through, you're welcome to ask any question at all on the New Users Page of the Staff Lounge. Just hit the "+" sign on the top of that page, and enter your question! -- Herby talk thyme 18:22, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikibooks.

I note you've been doing a lot of editing on the Muggle's Guide. We do appreciate it. However... we would like to keep the links pointing internally within the Wikibooks volume, rather than having them point out to Wikipedia.

For instance, the link to the Vanishing Cabinets that you added: you set that to Vanishing Cabinet. To keep that within the Muggles' Guide book, that being in a book chapter, you could have set the link to Vanishing Cabinet, and that would have pointed to our internal writeup on that subject.

If you need pointers on setting up the links, please feel free to ask. And thanks again for your interest. Chazz (talk) 20:38, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Muggles' Guide Deathly Hallows themes
Very nicely done. Thank you for that. Chazz (talk) 20:27, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

your user page
Hope you don't mind me tweaking it -- I noticed an apostrophe out of place, and put it back to get rid of a redlink there. If I have offended, please feel free to chastise me. Chazz (talk) 15:41, 18 October 2007 (UTC)


 * It's odd how real life seems to get in the way that way, isn't it? Though I believe law school is likely more important than Wikibooks.


 * Dumbledore: Yeah, a lot of jaws dropped when that came out – that was part of the recent book tour, I think the last US stop, where Rowling came out with that. While I didn't pick up on it either, it suddenly made Dumbledore's ignorance of Grindelwald's true nature make sense. Even in the one letter that got published there, we can see that Dumbledore is rationalizing some aspects of Grindelwald's nature, and that sort of worship didn't make a huge amount of sense... but if Dumbledore was infatuated with Grindelwald, then it works. I'm thinking that we mention the infatuation just as a separate fact in the Greater Picture sections where it is slightly important, and leave it out of the rest of the write-up. Chazz (talk) 15:48, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Welcome back!
Long time no edit!

One thing I should mention: as we gear up for the PDF and print versions of the book, we have modified all of our internal links to be fully-qualified, e.g. Ashwinder. I suspect you've already noticed that.

As a result of this, however, we are now keeping a full list of all the pages in the book on the Contents page. When you add a new page, apart from the link on the topic page (e.g. Magic), you should also put a link on the Contents page so that it will get included into the PDF and print versions. Also, the PDF converter breaks down on redlinks, so it is best to not include a page unless we are certain that we have time to actually at least put a framework of the page in there. I've already done this for your new Ashwinder and Augurey pages.

Again, welcome back, and happy editing! Chazz (talk) 17:22, 5 March 2008 (UTC)