User talk:Jaipaldatta

Come introduce yourself at the new users page. If you have any questions, you can ask there or contact me personally. – Mike.lifeguard  | talk 20:15, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Re:Impersonation
I'm sorry that you feel there is some sort of problem with User:Shahab. However, none of our records indicate any kind of a problem. It is not our duty to police possible identity theft on other websites, nor is it our duty to prove that User:Shahab here is the same as a person who appears to have impersonated you elsewhere. I would ask that you please stop making these allegations, because they are neither constructive nor suitable subject matter for Wikibooks. --Whiteknight (Page) (Talk) 12:45, 24 September 2007 (UTC) I am not I T Expert. I do not know how to write in Wi Ki Books and share my knowledge with others and learn from others. This may be starting problems with a new system. I hope You may understand. --Jaipal Singh Datta  ;

Your userpage
I moved the page Jaipal Singh Datta to User:Jaipaldatta, since it appeared to be your userpage. I recommend removing phone numbers and emails from it, though. Instead, you might enable email from within Wikibooks, so users can contact you by email without seeing your email address. – Mike.lifeguard  &#124; talk 02:17, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

WB:HELP
Thank you for notifying the community about your contributions. We're well aware of what you're planning to write; there's no need to continually advertise it. Continuing to do so is disruptive; please use WB:HELP for requests for assistance - it is a page to ask for help; not a page to constantly advertise what you're doing. Thanks for your understanding. – Mike.lifeguard  &#124; talk 18:49, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Your book(s)
Are all the books you are currently working on different? It seems like you are putting the same content into several books with similar but different titles. Please review our naming policy, and make sure that you follow it. As well, please submit only one copy of the book under one title; there is no need for multiple copies in multiple locations. That will not make it easier to find. Thanks – Mike.lifeguard  &#124; talk 04:52, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Gita
I was reading through this page, and I worry that it might be a violation of policy. You should read Our inclusion policy. Specifically, I worry that this page is:


 * 1) Original research. This means that the thought is original, and that it cannot be referenced or verified using other sources. Original research is not allowed on Wikibooks because all information here needs to be verifiable.
 * 2) An advertisement. It seems like you are using this book as an advertisement for your own personal website. Advertisements like this, even if you aren't using it to make money, aren't allowed on wikibooks.
 * 3) A soapbox. A soapbox means that you are using this page to express your personal beliefs. Wikibooks needs to be unbiased, so you cannot use books here to lend credibility to your personal beliefs.

Please correct me if I am wrong about these. However, if your book is a violation of these policies, and is not corrected, it could be deleted. --Whiteknight (Page) (Talk) 02:30, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) I agree that the thought is original. I feel that what ever is written in Bhagwat Gita can be proved as science instead of belief. I also feel that it can not be challenged as this is a scientific fact. So I thought of publishing in Wiki Book so that I may get corrected or modified.
 * 2) Please inform if there is any other plateform to inform about this new scientific analysis?
 * 3) I am ready to delete, if it can not be verified.Jaipaldatta 02:45, 19 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Science, by it's very nature, must be open to challenge. If it cannot be challenged, it is faith, not science. Saying that the Bhagwat Gita is "fact" is the same as saying that the bible is "Fact" or that any other book is "fact". If you are interested in getting help on your work, and are looking for helpers to work on your analysis, you may be more interested in either Wikiversity or Wikia. Wikiversity does allow certain types of original research and original work. Wikia has very few restrictions about content. --Whiteknight (Page) (Talk) 02:49, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Kindly Guide how to go about? Either to Wikiversity or Wikia . As I mentioned that I have not translated Bhagwat Gita but I have only touched those points which can be explained with the help of Amino Acids or new scientific developments. But no discussions on this platform. I agree that it needs discussions and it should be approved by experts of Biology, Bio Technology, Doctors of HUman BOdy and Computer experts. Your guidnace is requested or I request you to guide and help me for right line of action. Thanks and regards.Jaipaldatta 03:02, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Both Wikia and Wikiversity use the same software as we use, so uploading to those websites should be the same process that you used to upload the content here. I'll ask at Wikiversity if they would allow material like this book. If they don't allow it, or if you don't want to wait for a reply, you can start looking around Wikia. I am not very familiar with Wikia, so I don't know the exact process. I will see if i can find somebody who is more familiar with it. --Whiteknight (Page) (Talk) 03:06, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I shall wait for your guidance. In one day or two I shall clean here or delete this book in wikibook. Waiting for your help.Jaipaldatta 03:14, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Thank you for being so cooperative and understanding! I don't want to discourage you, I just want to make sure that your work is in the best possible spot, so that you can attract the largest number of readers and contributors. I have spoken to people at Wikiversity, and they agree that you would be best served at Wikia. Two places you may want to look at are and . Find the best home for your work there. --Whiteknight (Page) (Talk) 03:22, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Deletion of Gita
I have tried to modified and removed some lines which may have misunderstood as fact or new ideas. Gita is always new and has been written by other Authors also. I do not want to enter in to discussion. I did not find other site like Wikia useful for this subject. Still I have added in Hinduism and in Atheist. Hinduism is not a religion. It is a way of life.In the same way Gita or Bhagwat Geeta or Srimad Bhagwat Geeta is not a religious book. In any case It can not be compared with "Bible or Quoran".I am modifing Gita written. As mentioned that It can be edited by others. My name can be removed.16:07, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Gita

 * I Agree. Kindly Delete. Thanks. God Bless You!Jaipaldatta 17:44, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the reply. If you'd like to comment on the nomination further, it is located here. Also, there's no need to blank the pages; an administrator will delete them as necessary. – Mike.lifeguard  &#124; talk 18:02, 24 November 2007 (UTC)