User talk:JMRyan

Moved Under construction, Update Message
I have moved the Under construction, Update Message from Introduction_to_Philosophy/Logic to the disussion page. I think that its understood that most pages are always under going change and the message of what work you will be performing is nessary but more appropriate in the discussion page. 24.233.178.22 (talk)

Set Theory Move
Go ahead and move the Set Theory into its own book, I also don't understand why Discrete Mathematics has its own separate book on it also. Fephisto 04:09, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

Copyright problem with Image:EquivalenceSign.png
I don't think such symbol can be copyrighted. Insert public domain. --Derbeth 21:21, 12 October 2005 (UTC)

Manual of Crime
Could you sign your vote? For ease: your vote and edit here. Thx in adv. Trödel 16:18, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
 * No problem - I think everyone - I know I have several times - forgets to sign - and I appreciated it on wikipedia when someone let me know I had forgotten :) Trödel 20:00, 1 December 2005 (UTC)

BimBot
Excuse me, I forgot it. Thanks, Pietrodn 17:21, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

UK Constitution
Have you considered voting for UK Constitution and Government again this month, as it has been renominated. It relly is a very good book.Dolive35 15:52, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

Trouble with Mandy
Dear JMRyan, I put the Trouble with Mandy up for speedy deletion. It is a duplicate of an existing page. I am new here and didn't realize it was still there. --AJ Castro 05:06, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

Social Postulates
Thanks for the information. I've expanded the book into a full project proposal so that the tasks can be automated. It is beneficial to see the information in book form for the next 3-5 months until the project is up and running. At that time, I plan to delete the book unless someone else wants to use it as a textbook to document the unique philosophical questions raised and answered during the formation of the project. --Zephram Stark 15:39, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

Muggle Vandalism
Thanks for the heads up. I watch the high-profile pages of the book but I wouldn't have caught one of those. The real problem with the book is that there are so many content pages that I can't keep track of all the new ones created in the book in order to enforce project standards. They were really just bad edits and so I removed them, but I wouldn't necessarily call them vandalism. -Matt 19:26, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

Thanks a lot
Thanks for reverting that vandal in the Magician Guide in Maple Story. That was most definitly a vandal.

Policy review
Policy is not the most exciting subject at Wikibooks but we do have some major unresolved issues.

The most important issue, in my opinion, is Dispute resolution which starts by declaring that:

"Currently there is no official organized process to resolve disputes between users"

The suggested remedy for this is: Ad hoc administration committee which puts into place the absolute minimum in terms of an enforcement apparatus.

The second most important is No personal attacks where a vote has recommended the policy be enforced but it still languishes as "proposed".

The third policy that is needed and which will prevent edit disputes from getting out of hand is Editing disputes policy.

Other policies that need consideration are at: Policies and guidelines.

Please spare a minute or two to peruse these issues and add a comment and/or a vote. RobinH 12:18, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

No personal attacks Change of text
You voted for enforcement of No personal attacks. The text of this policy has been changed by Jguk during the vote, I have further modified these changes to restore some of the original "bite". This is highly unusual but without these changes Jguk is unwilling to allow the policy to move to enforced. I am happy that the changes are not sufficiently substantial to undermine the policy, if you disagree then please make your views known. Changes to text during a vote could be construed as a delaying tactic so I have proposed a move to "enforced" status by 1st June. RobinH 10:08, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

Modal Logic
Hello, I started writing the section on modal logic in the introduction to philosophy:logic wikibooks some time ago but, as you say, everything became a bit too messy. If you would like any help with modal logic or any help with extending, changing or clearing up the part I am responsible for, please feel free to leave me a message. (Alex beta 18:54, 9 February 2007 (UTC))