User talk:Faulknerck2

Welcome to Wikibooks, Faulknerck2!  First steps tutorial Wikibooks is for freely-licensed collaboratively-developed textbooks. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing and assume good faith about the intentions of others. Remember, this is a wiki, so you're allowed to change just about anything, and changes can be made easily. Come introduce yourself to everyone, and let us know what interests you.

If you're coming here from other Wikimedia projects, you should read our primer for Wikimedians to get quickly up-to-speed.  Getting help  Goodies, tips and tricks  Made a mistake? Thanks. Thenub314 (talk) 20:00, 4 July 2010 (UTC) (P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)
 * See the Wikibooks help pages for common issues, or read Using Wikibooks for a more user-friendly introduction to the project.
 * Remember, every edit is saved, so if you make mistakes, you can revert to an earlier version if needed.
 * Get help from the community in the user assistance room or in our IRC channel.
 * Files must be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, unless they are copyrighted and need to be uploaded here under fair use. If you need to upload a fair use file, you may request permission to do so. Please be sure to provide the required : a license tag and source are always required; fair use images require a.
 * Please fill in the edit summary and preview your edits before saving.
 * Sign your name on discussion pages by typing &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;
 * User scripts can make many tasks easier. Look at the Gadgets tab of my preferences; check off the boxes for the scripts you want, and hit save!
 * Please make sure you follow our naming policy - modules should be named like.
 * Need to rename a page? Use the move tab (only becomes available once your account is 4 days old - until then, ask for help).
 * To get a page deleted, add to the top of the page.
 * If something you wrote was deleted, please read the deletion policy, and check the deletion log to find out why. Also check the RFD archives if applicable. You can request undeletion at WB:RFU, or ask the administrator who deleted the page.

C++ Programming exercise
system("PAUSE"); is not portable. (Just to explain the undo I made) --Panic (talk) 21:45, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

question
why don't u like Microsoft.? and .NET .??


 * Microsoft is known to exert anticompetitive practices and .NET is an extension of that strategy (net was a response to Java and a requirement to streamline the Win32 API). Even if it is good for the corporation and its shareholders it has had a extremely nefarious impact in all aspects of software developments and software and protocol interactions. Most obvious is the price engineering and deceiving marketing campaigns the corporation engages in. There is nothing to like about MS in general, most users up until now have been kept hostages on the walled garden created for them.
 * Most if not all corporations are evil (a corporation is an entirety created solely for the purpose of obtaining profits for the shareholders, without any other regard besides the word of law) but among them some manage to behave worst that others in relation to the consumers and the environment they operate, even attempting to circumvent the legal requirements. For instance MS was convicted several times of monopolistic practices, so not all is subjective or due to a skewed point of view.
 * Did this help? --Panic (talk) 21:28, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Remember to sign your posts with four tildes ( ~ ). --Panic (talk) 22:52, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I hope so and I guess that's the nature of capitalism. ;)
 * That can be argued, I guess that if we accept such practices or in the even that governments are incapable of controlling those entities and work for the benefit of all present and future citizens, we get in a situation of savage capitalism, that is a bit different of simple capitalism. But I agree that in part this reality is already taking shape as capital in many locations has subverted democratic choice, and public offices and resources. --Panic (talk) 00:06, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Sign your posts and reply here, I'm monitoring this page, and will reply here. --Panic (talk) 00:06, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Faulknerck2 (talk) 14:40, 12 July 2010 (UTC)Panic2k4 can you edit more and accept the section that submitted by me.!


 * Done so and tweaked it a bit, the English is very broken and some examples seem weird (haven't looked too deeply on what is there just removed some of the HTML and made it more sane for the reader, see if you can look at the examples first. I'll help as I have the time. --Panic (talk) 23:42, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
 * You mentioned C++0x, I have so far refrained to do any work on it since it would required to add that indication and the standard isn't already fixed in stone, no objection here, but take this in consideration. --Panic (talk) 23:44, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Faulknerck2 (talk) 00:29, 13 July 2010 (UTC)well Visual studio C++ 2010 is already supported C++0x I mean partially so why we miss that.?? infact most of people use VS and its expression edition is completely free and supported both Native and CLR version. I know you dislike Microsoft :) but give it a shot you may like it probably ;) !
 * I do use VS but I don't agree that most people use it but VS and MS does not set the C++ standard in fact it often breaks it :), in any case I do request that when adding content do avoid referring for now to C++0x keywords and if you do never forget to add a note that it will be only available in the C++0x version of the standard.
 * Personally I'm aware of the changes but have not used any C++0x innovations in production code. --Panic (talk) 00:34, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Faulknerck2 (talk) 11:24, 13 July 2010 (UTC)Panic2k4 yea I have already added a note ,you can see when I mention about nullptr I said it's part of C++0x it may probably useful to people who use VS C++ 2010 version right.? we need to think about all parties when write an article unless there is a lack diversity.maybe they would think they are considered as ignorance.lolZ I saw most of new bie people(of course I am some sorta of a new bie, 1st year in college :D) tend to use VS cause it has a nice interface ,nice coding fonts, and even lot of tools personally I have everything QT, VS, wxDEV(the new version), Mono and I guess QT makes your work easy.

Signing your posts
Hi, Faulknerck, it is recommended that you sign you posts after them, not before. Instead of this:

~ Hi, I am wondering... Which returns: Arlen22 (talk) 15:29, 14 July 2010 (UTC) Hi, I am wondering...

it is recommended to do it like this:

Hi, I am wondering... ~ Which returns: Hi, I am wondering... Arlen22 (talk) 15:29, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

I hope I am not making myself too hard to understand. Arlen22 (talk) 15:29, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Faulknerck2 (talk) 15:58, 14 July 2010 (UTC)Faulknerck FaulknerckFaulknerck2 (talk) 15:58, 14 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Please also note the following: indentation is usually used in discussions, like I'm doing now. Also, please do not type your username as it's already in the sig. Also, if you do this in editing mode:

I like pie I don't like ice-cream
 * Then it will appear: I like pie I don't like ice-cream. Kayau ( talk &#124; email &#124; contribs ) 00:26, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

what the hell it's in correct.!! I like Ice cream but don't like pie :D

????
Further personal attacks such as this will result in you being blocked. Please remember to assume good faith. Thenub314 (talk) 20:36, 15 July 2010 (UTC) being blocked or whatever I am here to post what I know not to earn money ,so if you people treat like new comers by trolling or treat much negatively what's the point in here there is no benefit I got by posting anything in here just spend my time Faulknerck2 (talk) 02:38, 16 July 2010 (UTC)faulknerck2
 * The point is that you don't need anything that you have requested. You don't need anything in fact. Just start contributing. Admin is given out carefully, and only by community consensus. I already have a thousand edits on Wikibooks, but I am not an admin. Stick around, contribute what you know, and have fun. You don't need anything more than what you have now to do that. Oh, and remember, assume good faith, this is the key to Wikibooks. Cheers, Arlen22 (talk) 14:44, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

well I see what you have contributed to Wikibooks it's upto you if you have requested nothing still it doesn't mean I don't want anything/ in wikipedia they directly say you need to contribute lot of articles to be an admin but in here they say you don't need any special qualifications ,if any authorities one like he can directly give that to anyone probably it can got much easily if have a bureaucrat friend.but I don't have lolz anyway at least there is no considerable role still I got, I got nothing so I won't post anything till I get something. I am not asking money or something I ask a considerable role.and don't think I beg cause I don't want to beg just like a fag ,If I really want to post anything there are thousand of sites online infact I have never used Wikibooks and don't use and occasionally see it shows up in first pages when I search something. just want to help Wikimedia project cause I have refereed Wikipedia lot.! and thought this place might be good as well, if you want me to leave I will leave if you want me to stay then consider my one of requests so I can contribute lot of articles than you realize in my fields and I saw when I ask the permission to Admin most of people said I don't have a knowledge in Wikibooks rules and regulations and their policies and I have just joined. how they know I don't know anything ah.? I wonder there are magicians on Wikibooks as well, but that's not a reason to prevent being an admin.! according to administrative requirements any bureaucrat can give that! and I saw couple of bureaucrats around there. they just ignore me I guess. you think I ban people like hell and do vandalism works .? nope.. probably that may you think and there is no reason, and you don't have a proper reason to tell me why I don't need anything ,you just keep saying I have just joined because of that I don't need anything ,infact since I have joined I have posted valuable posts,that's not even that author of that book know probably.it's just the beginning and I didn't join today ,it's 6 or 7 of july so that's a good value for anyone to ask any role. probably people jealous upon other people or share that among their friends. and don't teach me how to be an admin I know that well.! and I am NOT a troll.

Faulknerck2 (talk) 18:09, 16 July 2010 (UTC)faulknerck2
 * Don't take it personally that they didn't give you admin status. I doubt I would get it either.  You do not need anything to contribute to Wikibooks.  This is a volunteer project. It is like a volunteer library that anyone can contribute to, organize, and so forth. If someone walks in, does a little bit, then says "I want to be an admin", no one is likely to support giving him adminship. Here on Wikibooks, a bureaucrat would likely get kicked out if he gave adminship to someone without consensus. It has nothing to do with knowing a bureaucrat. Arlen22 (talk) 18:26, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
 * There are only a few admins out of many active users. And finally, we welcome your help, but "you give me this or I won't help" is not how this community works. People have to prove to the community that they are worthy of getting what they request. Most of the admins had been active for a long time - certainly longer than two weeks - before they got adminship. Also, use the criticism you get in requests for permission constructively, this is something they stress on Wikipedia, and is the same here. Finally, which Wikipedia have you been contributing to? On the English Wikipedia you have a grand total of 44 edits. Arlen22 (talk) 18:38, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

then why people become an admin.???? and the way to become one of them.? I have never asked from Wikipedia give me the admin-ship cause I know what they have asked from contributors but here it's different they don't have a specific qualification.I know Wikibooks is a public library./
 * Adminship is for people who are trusted on Wikibooks to know how the community works very well. That way they don't make wrong decisions. The edit count is a pretty good indicator of their level of experience and involvement in a project. Here, adminship is pretty similar to the way it is on Wikipedia. Arlen22 (talk) 18:45, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

July 2010
We welcome and appreciate your feedback, but your recent edits to Wikibooks:Requests for permissions had to be undone. When interacting with other contributors, it is important to assume good faith and be respectful. We would like to remind you not to attack other editors. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this project. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the page or issue in question. Thank you. – Adrignola talk 20:14, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Undone you removal
I've restored the information you recently deleted, regarding pointer declarations, they are valid declarations and had educational value in that context. I think the comments already expressed you concern, see if you need to do more on the text around it to make it more clearer. Don't forget to correct the examples in your last addition to that page. --Panic (talk) 19:45, 16 July 2010 (UTC)