User talk:ClareParlett/sandbox/Approaches to Knowledge/Seminar Group 10/Truth in Politics

Hey Edward! Just looked at your edits - love the new structure and the new subtitles.... Ending sentence on the last paragraph especially was really good and I completely agree - that case was no longer about the law. I hope you don't mind that I made tiny changes to words I thought was unnecessary and also added a few commas... There was one sentence that was a bit unclear to me ("People who opposed the appointment believed, that even if the nominee denied the allegation and the time is limited for the Senate vote, he should not be appointed anyway because there was no thorough investigation and should wait for an FBI investigation."), so many you can explain that to me tomorrow. Francesca.roga (discuss • contribs) 18:32, 29 November 2018 (UTC) Francesca