User talk:Cecila123

ok.Cecila123 (discuss • contribs) 14:39, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

Wiki Exercise screen-time survey (part1)
In the recent course, we discussed the screen-time categories and Time allocation proportion of each person. Screen time is the amount of time spent using a device such as a smartphone, computer, television, or video game console. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Screen_time. Data statistics based on each person's time allocation on screen-time. Through data indicating that it can be roughly divided into four categories, they are phone, TV, Laptop, and Tablet.

First of all, among all of the categories, people will spend more time on mobile phones. From this data, it can also reflect today's social phenomenon which is today's technology development, mobile phones are no longer the simple devices that can only make text messages by phone in an earlier era. It is slowly upgrading to high-end technology, and high-end mobile phones have become an indispensable part of our daily life. For example, we can use the app on the mobile phone to let us build a social circle, make our life more convenient and can complete the purchase of daily needs. Moreover, Mobile phone users are not only for young people but also for children and the elderly. A data from a recent survey can be proved: “The UK is one of the world’s top-ranked markets for internet penetration: Over 80 percent of the population will go online regularly in 2017” (eMarketer 2017).

Secondly, compared with the other two (TV and tablet), the total time is more than computers, because laptops are not a substitute for today's society, people usually choose computers for research projects or professionals. ‘Working partner’ of work. Computers not only that have unlimited applications which can benefit our daily learning and working, but also increasingly at a steady rate. Because of the development of technology, the use of computers can satisfy the benefits of making our work or learning faster and simpler. The impact of computers on us is more and more significant, and it has brought us a more positive side in modern society.

In general, through the screen-time survey in class, we can get a conclusion that with the development of technology, more and more people rely on electronic devices, and positive aspect is to make our lives more convenient, let us break the culture and distance obstacles to recognizes more international friends, allows us to increase efficiency in work and study, and so on.Cecila123 (discuss • contribs) 11:43, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

References (part1)
eMarketer. (2017) UK Digital Users: The eMarketer Forecast for 2017. eMarketer Research. https://www.emarketer.com/Report/UK-Digital-Users-eMarketer-Forecast-2017/2001988 [Accessed:7 October 2018]

Wiki Exercise (part 2)
Pendlebury, David. 1991. Letter to the editor. Science 251. 5000 (March 22): 1410-11.

In this article, David through data statistics to reflect the lack of citation of papers by authors the world over. The author uses two different types of journals as examples, surveys the data cited for articles in arts and humanities journals. To in-depth expression, in the social science journal, the citations of these two journals are not positive. The article is useful to my research topic, as the author says, we see no such Inspired trend in the scientific literature over time. Thus people are interested in the numbers, the author will be generating article-only statistics, both U.S and the world over to do more extensive research in the coming months. This article will be useful supplementary information for my research on the audiences of printed publications.Cecila123 (discuss • contribs) 11:43, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

Wiki Exercise: Social Movement Case Study(part 3)
Social movement case Social movement is no stranger to people in Western countries. A social movement can be defined as“organizational structures and strategies that may empower oppressed populations to mount effective challenges and resist the more powerful and advantaged elites.”(Shannon 2011) In short, it is an act of dissatisfaction with the actions of the government or superiors, and the spontaneous organization of these oppressed groups in the society. Of course, most of this behavior is due to the oppressed people expecting a new system and the future development trend that they are eager to be satisfied with themselves. Just like a book called The Social Movements Reader, Goodwin and Jasper write that ‘‘It is often social movements that develop new ways of seeing society and new ways of directing it. They are a central part of what has been called “civil society” or the “public sphere”, in which groups and individuals debate their own futures.” The social movement is an activity initiated by the people. Everyone can speak freely, they can also put forward ideas for advocating or opposing others. Everyone's opinions are heard, and finally, the policy mechanism is to sum up a consensus. Every member of the social movement is almost pursuing a future direction that is more hopeful and beneficial to themselves. For example, September 17, 2011, thousands of Americans occupied the Zuccotti Park near the Wall Street financial district in New York, opening the vigorous “Occupy Wall Street” campaign. The participants in the movement were dissatisfied with the ugliness and injustice under the capitalist system and called for a new order of equality and democracy. Todd Gitlin who is a Columbia University professor says "What a movement that has any kind of success does -- not necessarily practical results but any kind of excitement -- is acquaint or reacquaint people with some of the pleasures of being involved in a social movement," Indeed, such an 'Occupy Wall Street' campaign, although not really having substantive political appeals, has not received the response of the government’s corresponding politicians, but this event is what they think is very meaningful because the people they feel their sense of participation and feel a step closer to the full democracy what they want. People with the same proposition gather together, and at the same time let them feel the importance of unity and the fun of debate. This is the main meaning of social movement.Cecila123 (discuss • contribs) 11:37, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

References(part3)
Sanchez, R. (2016-09-16). Occupy Wall Street: 5 years later. CNN. Available: https://edition.cnn.com/2016/09/16/us/occupy-wall-street-protest-movements/index.html [Accessed: 2018.11.8]

Wiki Exercise: What Are Wikis?(part 4)
What is a wiki? "A wiki is a server program that allows users to collaborate in forming the content of a Web site" (Jennings, 2006). In short, it is a platform for multi-person collaboration in writing and communication. The wiki can be multi-tasking. People (and even any visitors) maintain that everyone has the right to express their own ideas or opinions. Wikis are divided into many small modules, such as Wikipedia, Wikipedia is a free, open collaboration platform, the platform participants from all over the world. Anyone can create, edit, and rewrite articles or entries on the Wikipedia platform, which is enough to show that the platform is different from Google or Baidu. There is also a module called Wikibooks, in which there will be a large number of free textbooks and manuals, all types of books will be presented in this module, and it will also recommend our selection of books, which are some good books. when we want to understand a new field, we can see the books recommended by our predecessors from this module. This will not only reduce the time we choose to study materials, but also increase our learning efficiency and fast. Master a skill or understand an area. Of course, if you are people who like to share, you can edit the fields you know in Wikibooks, and give more help to some friends who want to know about this field. For us, this is more like a resource exchange. One of the modules I like more is Wikinews, because, in this module, the news is written by ourselves, we can write news of our own country, and we can see news from all countries of the world. This will allow us to understand the latest news that the world is going through, to understand what is happening in other countries, and to participate in the discussion of the news. One of the highlights in this module is that he will choose the best work, which can make people who are not journalists professional, a little sense of accomplishment. "Wiki" is a composition system; it's a discussion medium; it's a repository; it's a mail system; it's a tool for collaboration"(Lebar, 2017 ). Wiki is a platform that is very suitable for collaboration, because we can discuss, communicate, and collaborators create common projects that can assist us with research or learning, and this is where the platform is fascinating. I am currently using Wikibooks. I have established a project with my classmates in this module. This project is to write an article together. In the page we created, the students discussed each other and could write an article together and write to each other. In the article, we feel that inappropriate statements can be modified and we can share the bibliography. This setting allows us to cooperate better. And when I am in trouble, I can search for answers in Wikipedia, but this platform also has shortcomings, because everyone can edit, so academic considerations are still to be considered.Cecila123 (discuss • contribs) 10:58, 23 November 2018 (UTC)

References(part4)
Jennings, E. (2016) Definition Wiki. Posted by: Margaret Rouse. https://whatis.techtarget.com/definition/wiki [Accessed: 23 Nov 2018]. Lebar, Z. (2017) What Are Wikis, and Why Should You Use Them? https://business.tutsplus.com/tutorials/what-are-wikis-and-why-should-you-use-them--cms-19540 [Accessed: 23 Nov 2018].

Suggestions
Hi I observed you haven't put any images so far. I was just wondering if you want to give it a try? I think it adds value to the overall feel of the page. Just go to WikiCommons and type the keywords in the search bar according to your requirements. Then scroll down and click on the 'open in media viewer'. On your right you can see multiple icons, choose the last one that says share and embed. Click on embed and copy the link from there and paste inside the text on the required page. You can choose the placement. If you wnat to see how the link looks like then click 'edit' to review and get a better idea. I have done it here, hope this helps!

And oh by the way I have clicked this picture. You can also do it if you can't find any image related to your work or projects then just click and upload on WikiCommons so others on this community can also get benefit out of it. Awesooome92 (discuss • contribs) 19:57, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

Hi I did some adjustments on your work if you don't mind :) and let me know if you needed any help with anything, again please do not hesitate to contact anyone of us If you need to improve your work here on Wikibooks. Have a wonderful night Zam (discuss • contribs)

Thank you very much for your help, you guys are super kind. I will try to add pictures by myself. (^0^)Cecila123 (discuss • contribs) 22:20, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

Hey Don't mention it dear, feel free to ask for any help ;* Zam (discuss • contribs)

Instructor Feedback on Wiki Exercise Portfolio
Posts of this standard roughly correspond to the following grade descriptor. Depending on where your actual mark is in relation to the making criteria as outlined in the relevant documentation, it should give you an idea of strengths and weaknesses within the achieved grade band overall:


 * Pass . Among other things, pass entries may try to relate an idea from the module to an original example, but might not be very convincing. They may waste space on synopsis or description, rather than making a point. They may have spelling or grammatical errors and typos. They might not demonstrate more than a single quick pass at the assignment, informed only by lecture and/or cursory reading. They may suggest reading but not thinking (or indeed the reverse). The wiki markup formatting will need some work.

This work is at the lower end of this grade band, so there’s clearly room for improvement here. I think in order to engage with the wiki exercises a bit more, it might be useful for you to take a closer look at the assessment brief to get more of an idea of how to hit those targets.

Detail:
 * Ex#2: this annotated bibliography entry is a little dry and would benefit from more creative use of the platform to generate a more visually-engaging price e.g. captioned images. There are also some real problems with your grammar and expression here - I wonder if you would find it of benefit to seek additional support to help improve your academic writing. Certainly, additional proofreading prior to submission would improve your work immensely. It is also, if anything, a little short – you could have added at least one more sentence, if not two to flesh out your account here.
 * Ex#3: you have chosen a very good case study as a vehicle to illustrate social movements and demonstrate some understanding of social movements as civic activities. Again, some work is needed on your academic English in order to articulate more clearly, and your work tends to be on the descriptive side. I would have liked a little more explicit connection made between one or two of the elements in your argument rather than as a succession of statements. In addition, it is rather a shame that you didn’t use the platform’s affordances (e.g. use of captioned images from Commons) to help illustrate your argument, and to visually engage the reader.
 * Ex#4: This piece is characterised mainly by factual description - whilst empirically accurate, this doesn’t really add anything to your response. Once the piece gets moving, you draw some connections between different approaches, using a (albeit limited) range of set reading. There are fewer grammatical slips in this particular piece, which suggests that you took a little more time to go through and check prior to the final edit. I do think, however, that a more considered, critical approach to the brief would have added significant value to your argument here.

General:
 * 'Reading and research': evidence of critical engagement with set materials; evidence of independent reading of appropriate academic and peer-reviewed material. Marginal.
 * 'Argument and analysis': well-articulated and well-supported argument; evidence of critical thinking (through taking a position in relation to key ideas from the module, and supporting this position); evidence of relational thinking (through making connections between key ideas from the module and wider literature, and supporting these connections); evidence of independent critical ability. Pass.
 * 'Presentation': good use of wiki markup and organisational skills. Pass.

GregXenon01 (discuss • contribs) 12:03, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

Instructor Feedback on your contribs to Essay Discussion Page
Contributions to discussion of this standard roughly correspond to the following grade descriptor. Depending on where your actual mark is in relation to the making criteria as outlined in the relevant documentation, it should give you an idea of strengths and weaknesses within the achieved grade band overall:


 * Among other things, contributions at this standard may just offer links without real comment or apparent point. They may offer nothing more than poor-quality synopsis or description of material of dubious relevance. They may have serious clarity problems (including dead links, random graphics) which affect comprehension (or even worse, admin warnings or take-down notices for copyright infringement). They might be off-topic, private trivia, or of unclear relevance. The wiki markup formatting will be of a poor standard.

In addition, you were asked in the brief to address the following guidelines in terms of contribution, engagement and conduct, Here is an evaluation of those elements of your activity on the Essay Discussion Pages:

•	Students should be engaging at least once a day, for the duration of the project. The following points illustrate how this engagement is evaluated.

•	Evidence from contribs to both editing and discussion of content (i.e. volume and breadth of editorial activity as evidenced through ‘contribs’). These are primarily considered for quality rather than quantity, but as a broad guideline: o	Each item on a contribs list that are 3000+ characters are deemed “considerable” o	Each item on a contribs list that are 2000+ characters are deemed “significant” o	Each item on a contribs list that are 1000+ characters are deemed “substantial” o	Items on a contribs list that are <1000 characters are important, and are considered in the round when evaluating contribs as a whole because of their aggregate value o	It is expected that you will make at least one contrib per day, for the duration of the project


 * Marginal. Inconsistent engagement throughout the duration of the project. A small number of smaller, but very important edits made on both your own pages and on the main essay discussion page. Unfortunately, there are relatively few of these and not at all at the frequency or volume expected for this level. There are, additionally, a small number of contribs that could be considered substantial, but no significant or considerable contribs (assessed according to the criteria above, and as set out in the assessment brief). Although it’s important to acknowledge that this is about quality of engagement much more than quantity, one would expect at least one or two of these more weighty contribs in there which would have made a positive difference to the essay and to the project overall.

•	Engagement with and learning from the community on Discussion Pages o	Evidence of peer-assisted learning and collaboration 	Marginal. o	Evidence of reading, sharing, and application of research to the essay 	Marginal. o	Evidence of peer-review of others’ work 	Marginal.

•	Reflexive, creative and well-managed use of Discussion Pages o	Clear delegation of tasks o	Clearly labelled sections and subsections o	Contributions are all signed 	Marginal.

•	Civility. Your conduct is a key component of any collaboration, especially in the context of an online knowledge-building community. For further information about this in a Wikimedia context, please go to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Five_pillars. Please respect others, as well as observe the rules for civility on wiki projects. All contribs are moderated. 	Merit. GregXenon01 (discuss • contribs) 12:09, 17 December 2018 (UTC)