User talk:Blinford

Come introduce yourself at the new users page. If you have any questions, you can ask there or contact me personally.

Don't worry about making edits. One of the best parts about Wiki technology is that people can make all sorts of changes without having to make everything perfect in the first edit. Make some changes, see how they look, and then make more changes! I'll look at the A-level book for you, but don't hesitate to make any improvements that you think are needed! --Whiteknight (Page) (Talk) 22:33, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Book Redundancy
What kinds of redundancy are we talking about? within a single book, or across multiple books? A book is supposed to be relatively self-contained. That means that the book needs to discuss the basics before it can move on to more advanced topics. To that effect, I'm certain that many books need to "review" certain topics (like newton's laws). Notice also that many books have different audiences and different prerequisties. This means that you can't consolidate all the review material because many books are trying to discuss the same topic in different ways.

However, if you find that many books share a common basis, that is that they cover the same kinds of materials in the same way, it would be acceptable to separate out this material into a single book, and then link your new book to all the old books that use it. For instance, if you wanted to write a book about "Physics Basics", and then use that as a prerequisite for other physics books, that would probably be fine. If you have doubt about something, ask me and I can give you some advice.

As to my user page, you are more then welcome to copy anything that you see on it. It is a result of a large amount of hard work on my part (perhaps too much). You are more then welcome to re-use some of the templates that I have created. Some templates, such as those that are highly specific to my own userspace, have been restricted from being included into other user pages. --Whiteknight (Page) (Talk) 22:58, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Re:Incorrect Image
Which image on that page is not correct? Since those images look an aweful lot like ordinary tables, maybe you can delete the image entirely and just replace it with a table containing the correct information. Otherwise, if you can send me a description of what precisely is wrong with it, maybe i can take a stab at it myself. let me know. --Whiteknight (Page) (Talk) 21:10, 11 September 2007 (UTC)