User talk:Atcovi/Archive 6

Chess guide for Intermediate player, review?
Are you alive? Please review the "pending updates", please. — Preceding unsigned comment added by U$3rname008 (talk • contribs) 14:54, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Yep, I'm alive. Not well but alive, indeed. Where are these pending changes you speak of? --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 18:51, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
 * ✅ I've gone ahead and reviewed the pending changes on the two pages related to that book. By the way, the book is at Chess guide for Intermediate player (though I should note that the book is very much still a stub). Leaderboard (discuss • contribs) 09:11, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Pardon; I tweaked the title, to Chess Guide for the Intermediate Player. ---Pi zero (discuss • contribs) 13:14, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

In the article
Hello and happy new year 2019, I am also part of SWMT and patrol in this article. My editions on this page seem correct to me, but you have canceled them. Consider these two sentences with highlighting : The Sentence 1 is JackPotte's sentence (also an administrator on this site) and identical to mine. Sentence 2 is that of 2405:205:4213:4206::15f8:e8a4 (so an anonymous user) and identical to yours. In enWikibooks, the rules for one version or another of the sentence is based on English rules or simple english rules and GIMP/Manual Of Style for this book (GIMP). I repeat here the dependencies rules used in this page :
 * 1) To put the tool on the panel go to  " Edit > Preferences > Toolbox "  .
 * 2) To put the tool on the panel go to  " Edit > Preferences > Toolbox . 
 * The other formatting of the book. Another sentence on the same page gives the procedure to follow:
 * "Shortcuts written here are the default values - you can change them any time in "Edit > Keyboard Shortcuts" or "Edit > Preferences > Keyboard Shortcuts". So it's a format of emphasis;


 * Quotation marks (en or simple): it goes in pairs;
 * Punctuation inside or outside and Effect on nearby punctuation (en or simple)
 * "Do not italicize surrounding punctuation";
 * "If the quotation is a single word or a sentence fragment, place the terminal punctuation outside the closing quotation mark."

In view of the above, I urge you to read POV. In Reviewing pages, if the last modification is not correct, do not remove all pending changes. The summary "Semicolon" of 2405:205:4213:4206::15f8:e8a4 has nothing to do with its modification. If you feel that my modification bothers you, I will ask you to comment on it before canceling. I think you hastily canceled my last change, so I put it back. can also review this page again and give us his opinion. Looking forward to reading you. Sincerely --Eihel (discuss • contribs) 06:17, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Watching this only, just to comment that this is not a small wiki as there are checkuser, so a summary of SMWT may not be appropriate. As of why there isn't a summary given, this wiki operates on flagged revisions which means if the intermediate changes are cancelled, it will be an automatic process and no summary will be given. The best place to ask for comment may be on the book discussion page and it may be best to consult the manual of style of similar books as there isn't a standard manual of style. The best is to compare the author of the book style and the current style. I'm also from SWMT. Regards and thanks for your efforts.--Cohaf (discuss • contribs) 06:50, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your intervention. Perfectly in agreement, the style of the book is the same as mine: the other phrase identical to mine in the book proves it. To prove also that I understand enWikibooks, I include the links of the rules of style above. For my SWMT intervention, I simply follow the links given in #cvn-sw, whether the wiki is large or small. Vandalism is vandalism wherever it is. You can close the debate by re-reading the article. Cordially. --Eihel (discuss • contribs) 07:14, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I see that Jack has accepted your changes. I see that the style is consistent with the book style which is correct to revert to the edition you proposed. For SMWT, I agree it's vandalism anywhere it is, but I personally don't use SMWT tag on wikis that are large, especially Spanish Wikipedia and like. I do not like to be misunderstood as belittling the Wikipedia. Regards,--Cohaf (discuss • contribs) 07:39, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

Hey and sorry for any misunderstandings, but sometimes, Wikibooks' rejecting system can be complicated. If I had accepted your revision, then this edit would've been accepted. Don't take it personally that your edit was one of those edits rejected, I was returning the page back to its "old self" (so to say), which I percieved to be as free of any grammatical errors/vandalism. I didn't specifically see the small error that ""Edit > Preferences > Toolbox." posed. Stuff like this happens all the time. Here in this revision, I am reverting changes made by a sysop and beauracrat here because his edits were in conflict with another user's edits to in which I deemed were inappropriate to the page (so I simply reverted to the page before all those changes even happened).

I think there was no need for this huge discussion over just a small tweak. If it really was a big deal, I would've left a message on your talk page. I think just making your change to the page, which was a small grammar fix, and moving on would've sufficied for this situation. EDIT: Though I will admit, I should've reverted the IP's edits and then acccepted the revision -- but with so many revisions to accept (I have about 20 tabs open just to accept changes sometimes) it can get pretty tedious and I might just go fast. Thanks. --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 11:58, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Actually having reviewed the differences it's really IMHO a meh. Indeed not worth to undergo such a long discussion.--Cohaf (discuss • contribs) 14:23, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Now that I am reviewers, you can take me away from me Autoreviewed users become useless. Cordially. --Eihel (discuss • contribs) 08:52, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
 * ✅ by Leaderboard --Eihel (discuss • contribs) 10:41, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Nuked Changes
Hey, I am part of the team at RadiumCore. I've been trying to update our documentation and materials but it seems that you guys are mistaking me for a bot/spammer and nuking everything. I'm not too familiar with this interface but I am hoping this gets to you. Please let me know how we can push those updates again and prevent this from happening in the future. Thanks!
 * Please answer Leaderboard's question on your talk page. --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 23:39, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

Chess Guide for Intermediate Player Question
Hey. I've completed the first chapter of my book, so can I remove that "stub" template now?

(Trying to be politely)
 * On an immediate glance of the main-page, it seems like it still merits a "stub" template. There only seems to be three pages (blue links, I should say) out of 21 pages listed at the Table of Contents. IMO 3/21 pages seem like a draft, but you don't have to listen to my comment. If you'd like, you can remove it. It's really up to you. --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 11:59, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

Change
Hi, I a confused over the change you made to my user rights. I assume there is a reasonable explanation, though I cannot work it out. Qwerty number1 (discuss • contribs) 21:02, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I removed a redundant permission. It is not necessary for your account to hold the Autoreview right as the Reviewer right already covers that. Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 21:08, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

XQuery book
Hi I see you reverted an edit of mine Kitwallace2on this wikibook. I'm ChrisWallace(new login) who started this book 12 years ago with Dmccreary. Many of the examples are out of date and/or run on an obsolete server and I'm beginning a long overdue task of refreshing the book. Thus there will be a number of substantive changes over the next few months.
 * Sorry. I saw that you linked a website which held a similar name to your username, so I thought it was another case of an advertiser arriving to Wikibooks in order to promote their website. Now that I understand the context I'll allow your revisions. --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 12:39, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Spanish Grammar
Hi a book I created, Spanish Grammar was deleted by you, as another page Spanish/Grammar/Index already exists. The page that already exists is a sub page of a text book about Spanish language learning.

The topic of Spanish Grammar is large enough to warrant its own book, rather than a sub section on another book. Can the pages be merged or the Spanish Grammar book undeleted? Thanks. Caitlinschultz (discuss • contribs) 16:31, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
 * I don't see the problem with expanding upon the existing page, Spanish/Grammar Index. It's a subpage of the general book Spanish so that users who are going straight to Spanish can easily find information about grammar. --—Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 16:35, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

Chess Guide thing again
Yep, the chapter 1 is completed but currently it is really messy. Can you please formatting that page? Also, please fix any errors in that page.
 * I apologize, but right now, I'm not the person you should seek for help at this time. EDIT: Please consider going to Reading room/Assistance or another administrator's discussion page. —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 12:44, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Thx for knowing that assistance thing.

My application for GR
Following a common past on this wiki, would you be kind enough to give a favorable opinion to my Global Rollback request for my work on SWMT on Steward requests/Global permissions. Friendly greetings. --Eihel (discuss • contribs) 01:45, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Quite frankly, this falls into the category of canvassing and I suggest you stop doing this. I do not have the time avaliable to give a proper opinion on the matter, so all I will say is "Good Luck". Prima. —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 01:54, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

Didnt ya forget me?
Sorry for annoying, but... I'm finally back here.

I will revise.my CHess Guide. Most of the resource comes from chess.com, but preferably I will add my own things.

By resource I mean those analyzed games. Chess.com analyzed them themselves but to me it isn't really satisfying. U$3rname008 (discuss • contribs) 03:19, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Good to see you back! EDIT: I've personally been busy with school so I should be back to regular editing soon. And yes, please revise them and add your own words. Thanks. —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 09:52, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Hey how do you become an admin? Bracket Lynch (discuss • contribs) 17:48, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

A request to see deleted edits of files
I need to see "Deleted version and deleted content" of User talk:Lzhwp,can you help me?--MCC214 (discuss • contribs) 08:13, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
 * I've sent you an email. Thanks. —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 23:04, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

Welp, back again
Shall I create a book called "Programming in 1L a"? By 1L a, I'm referring to 1L_a, which appears to be hard to program in.

EDIT: I created the book under my user page: Book

— Preceding unsigned comment added by U$3rname008 (talk • contribs) 15:34, 30 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Is this esoteric language your own creation? If so, it'd probably be disallowed on Wikibooks as original research. --Pi zero (discuss • contribs) 18:08, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
 * A look at that language founder's webpage and the user's website seems like that is highly unlikely. Leaderboard (discuss • contribs) 18:13, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Perhaps. I'm interested to hear U$3rname008's response. --Pi zero (discuss • contribs) 18:22, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Definitely not my own cre-ation. It is a well known and old language. Also if it is disallowed, I'll just complete it in my Userpage. — Preceding unsigned comment added by U$3rname008 (talk • contribs) 00:32, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Not a problem; as you explain the history of the language (which one supposes should go somewhere in the book, yes?), it sounds just fine. I look forward to the book.  (Though if it hadn't been, userspace wouldn't have been a solution... well, it's moot because there's no problem.)  I just wanted to be sure we were on the same page.  So to speak. --Pi zero (discuss • contribs) 00:43, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
 * I will explain the history of the language in the main page of the book; But not now since I don't have much time for Wikibook(Busy in real life, like the owner of this talk page).
 * Shall I move it to mainspace for you? As an admin, I am (I think) able to move the whole thing all at once and without leaving redirects. --Pi zero (discuss • contribs) 16:21, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Sure you can. --U$3rname008
 * Done. (book) --Pi zero (discuss • contribs) 02:23, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Apologies for not getting to this earlier. Good to see things are smooth. —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 20:02, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Help please?
Hi, Atcovi. I need help. I am a muslim. I am working on a book|textbook (see my contribs) I don't know how to categorize things. So could you help me. Thank you. Hamuyi (discuss • contribs) 15:40, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

A new proposal
Hi, there is currently a proposal at Wikibooks:Reading room/Proposals for non-admins to be given the ability of    and. Since you’ve been an active user on Wikibooks for the last thirty day, I thought you might join in by giving feedback/opinion or amendments. Thank you so much for your time Synoman Barris (discuss • contribs) 12:41, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

A heartfelt apology
Dear Atcovi, I'm really sorry with messing with the Asian article, I'm new here and when I saw the Asian article I was intrigued to learn more and when I saw orangutan spelt oran gutan. I wanted to help fix it but I mistakenly corrected the wrong thing and trying to fix that i made everything worse. I would have come to you if I knew you were the editor. I am truly sorry. That's why when I got a notification that you had already corrected the issue I was honestly grateful and thanked you. Please do not be angry at me. MargeIn (discuss • contribs) 05:34, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Oh don't be sorry everyone makes mistakes. I understand your new to our community and that's totally fine :-) Your edits made to Wikijunior:Asia ended up removing one of the images, hence why I rejected your changes. We have Sandbox where you're encouraged to experiment with wikitext and other such tests you may wish to make - also, make sure to read thoroughly the welcome message I put on your talk page (as that contains many useful info). But don't worry about, no one here is angry and we all make mistakes. If you need any help you're free to ask me. Thanks! —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 15:45, 21 November 2020 (UTC)


 * -) thank you MargeIn (discuss • contribs) 05:11, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Moving Wikibook Page
Hello, I don't understand how you moved my page Robust Hinf state feedback control: https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/LMIs_in_Control/Robust_H_inf_State_Feedback_Control but I need you to move it back. Thank you. Nnbeauli (discuss
 * - Hi, is your page not part of "LMIs in Control"? I'm assuming this because of this section saying to "refer back to the main page" (with a link to the LMIs in Control book). I moved your page because it was in the main space and was not part of a book (and therefore, a "lonely" page - it makes your page harder to find by readers). I moved it into the "LMIs in Control" book because I can see that your page is related to that topic. If this is not where you want your page to be under, where should it be under then? —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 16:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
 * - Yes, it should be in that book but it should be under the robustness section. I thought this is where I had put it. I am new to using wikibooks so could you share how to place it in the correct spot so I can place pages correctly in the future? I tried looking up how to move a page but I don't seem to have the "move" option or I just can't find it. Thank you.
 * I've moved your page as "LMIs in Control/Robustness/Robust H inf State Feedback Control" - now that it has the words, "LMIs in Control/Robustness", in front of it... it is now under that page (thus under the "robustness section"). In the future, if you want to create pages under a certain section, you create the page titles as so: put the section's page title (in this case, "LMIs in Control/Robustness") - afterwards, you put a "/" and your title follows afterwards (in this case, "/Robust H inf State Feedback Control"). For the move function, here's information on the move button on en.wikipedia. Thank you :) —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 01:36, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Looks like your user account here is only a day or two old. I think the wiki platform doesn't allow you to move pages until your account is a few days old (maybe four?).  That would explain why you didn't find any controls for doing a page move. --Pi zero (discuss • contribs) 03:22, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Revision history of "History of Opera/Florentine Camerata and Contemporaries"
I've changed the whole text, so if it's possible to do revision again. Sorry for incovenience🙏🏻, newby, I didn't check other sorces. MMMagnazza (discuss • contribs) 13:31, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
 * uh... the first sentence holds nearly identical resemblance to a reddit post? —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 03:03, 29 November 2020 (UTC)