User talk:Ace Baker

Copyright violations
Copyright violation require the and a proper description for the original work name or location or author contact. --Panic (discuss • contribs) 03:14, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

I have removed the deletion tag, and reverted to even older version of the page (older to your own edit). Note that simple phrases of a clearly factual nature are not copyrightable. --Panic (discuss • contribs) 03:20, 12 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the clarification. --Panic (discuss • contribs) 04:57, 13 January 2012 (UTC)


 * The file ThesisTitleNew.jpg and others may also constitute a violation of copyright (I have also found a derivation being used as an avatar at http://etsandreversals.yuku.com/topic/3627/Corposcindosis--Effects--Thoracic-Sympathectomy--Humans), a separate process may be required for the images since the copyright is distinct. --Panic (discuss • contribs) 05:17, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

If you are the copyright holder you can contact the Wikimedia Foundation designated agent to have the material permanently removed. QU TalkQu 22:01, 13 January 2012 (UTC)


 * I'm also a bit confused. You edited this page 2 years ago yet now you are claiming that there is a copyright violation?  Please explain.--ЗAНИA [[Image:Flag_of_Italy.svg|15px]]talk 00:23, 15 January 2012 (UTC)


 * I'm not interested in debating Wiki?edia policy. If you have any questions about copyright, please read this: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/ . If you wish to dispute my claim to copyright, the proper venue to settle that dispute is United States District Court. If you wish to understand my reason for enforcing my copyright, my reason is because the sky is blue. Ace Baker (discuss • contribs) 00:44, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I am not an agent of the Wikimedia Foundation so this is just my opinion.
 * You are an anonymous editor of a Wiki - we have no proof you own the copyright of the material and therefore cannot act on your "instructions" this way. You must contact the designated agent and provide proof of ownership of the copyright if you want an immediate resolution by the Foundation. At the moment we don't know who you are and therefore your claim of copyright cannot be substantiated. I suspect a US court would dismiss your claim immediately if you tried to claim copyright while refusing to identify yourself.
 * Also note that when you click "save page" you are agreeing to the Terms of Use and that includes releasing your contributions under the GFDL and CC-BY-SA 3.0 License. Therefore, by making edits here you have licensed the material for use here and that cannot be rescinded. This is the legal position and if you want to read more about it please go here where the conditions you agreed to are documented. Now perhaps you can see the complexity - you claim to be the copyright holder and not to have licensed the material for use here, but your edit history demonstrates in fact that you have licensed some of the material. As we don't know you are really the copyright holder (as you have as yet to identify yourself) we are in a difficult position to determine what to do, hence the time it is taking to review this issue. As I said above, if you are the copyright holder it would make everyone's life quicker and simpler if you would just contact the designated agent. Thanks QU TalkQu 11:20, 15 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Hi, I think I know what has happened here. If you give me a day or so we should have a resolution. I just need to discuss a couple of points with another party - thanks. QU TalkQu 11:35, 15 January 2012 (UTC)


 * I'm not interested in debating Wiki?edia policy. If you have any questions about copyright, please read this: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/ . If you wish to dispute my claim to copyright, the proper venue to settle that dispute is United States District Court.Ace Baker (discuss • contribs) 11:40, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Moving this discussion here. Please feel free to get your lawyers to contact the Designated Agent. However, I think you'll find it cheaper just to wait a couple of days until we have concluded the review QU TalkQu 12:10, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Corposcindosis
Your recent edits to this page are considered to be vandalism. If such unconstructive edits continue then you will be blocked from editing.

The above editors and administrators have tried to explain copyright issues to you. Any edits you previously made, whether as a registered user or an IP editor, were authorised when you submitted the work on the basis of the text written on the edit page (you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the CC-BY-SA 3.0 License and the GFDL).--ЗAНИA talk 12:07, 15 January 2012 (UTC)