User:Ohadaloni

Vote for deletion
Not necesserily this page, but all my other contributions to wikibooks. I am not an active wikibooks contributor anymore. To my knowldge, all my submissions from the past few days are not within wikibooks guidelines, due to a misunderstanding on my part, with respect to books VS textbooks, and the definition of either.

I appologize to whomever admin did or will do any work for this, and feel free to instruct me or ask for help.

Please visit my [page] at wikipedia.

--Ohadaloni 00:46, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

You Guys are Wierd
From Votes_for_deletion

I agree. There was a great confusion between the terms book and textbook.

This sequence of events could have been prevented by simply just one of you saying: Looks like Fiction, or, wikibooks is not for books, just textbooks, that must adhere to certain standards.

I write mostly fact based fiction in research style. but most is more fiction like than balanced knowledge material.

While Evolution Theory For Kids and NoSoul are books that might eventually fit wikibooks standards, also those will not meet them any time soon.

I propose an admin would delete all my work as is demanded by the wiki guidelines. As with wikipedia, I will not myself erase the content, for the sake of clarity.

I am assuming my page will remain, though my acitivites with wikibooks will cease, so I am placing a copy of this message on my page.

--Ohadaloni 18:26, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Post Scriptum
Not to negate my forced political stand above:

I am an educator, not a warrior.

As such my content will always present unbalanced opinion following the lines of my concept of life.

Reggy is a philosophy book, presented as a chapter inside a fiction novel. Reggy is the name I naturally also gave the entire novel. Evolution Theory For Kids is a superb pure textbook that can not be published in wikibooks mostly due to its big banging of God. NoSoul is a collection of verifiable facts regarding the human brain, composed to a single train of thought with no specific order. At this stage NoSoul is also very young. Jaccuse is a case study of an assasination attempt inside a modern day family. It is a factual, accurate, unbalanced descriotion of events.

There is no opinion, other than unbalanced opinion. The balance comes from the free disemination of information and opinion, not from its guarding police.

Unlike in the library, with wikibooks, one could say, lets delete this one, or one could say, lets fix this one.

I noticed the deleting and fixing part is what most wikibookiwhateverans do most of the time, as the content creation originality of this army is strictly forbidden.

With an Encyclopedia, the balance comes from the fact that each concept is a separate entity shared in its creation by many.

If you understand the Verifiable Statistical fact that a textbook is created by only one or a few, then you surely also understand that you will have to police its content forever if you want it to remain balanced. You will be forever at war with any creator, while hardly anyone else cares.

--Ohadaloni 05:29, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Terminus Pride of a Volunteer
I am a proud wikipedian. I lost my pride as a wikibookedian - even thuogh this is much more fitting my life's mission - due to opinion control regulations.

I thank the creators of the wikipedia software for having enlightened me with some minor software details. I will continue to thank the wikipedia by working frantically for its declared purpose with dedication.

My textbook writings I will keep at theora.com as before, with my open souce software presenting it, aided by some tricks I learned from the wikipedia software. it is also more financially beneficial for me this way.

--Ohadaloni 06:14, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

You are free to read unbalanced textbooks if you wish
If you have enough freedom in your mind to read unbalanced thoughts and make your own judgement, those books, and a few others, are at theora.com.

My blog is also there, at the home page, usually relying on verifiable facts, and it is hillarious.

e.g.

The Big Banging of God
Here is a textbook in its entirety you can study for years and still have a lot to learn.

It discusses a very tough educational problem where many opinions are required for the purpose of balance and proper education on the subject.

The opinions in this textbook are very carefully and precisely balanced, for educational purposes.

This in itself is a form of presentation of my own opinion, and is therefore intrinsically unbalanced, regardless of my superb objectivity.

You will need to be knwoledgable or read on for quite some time to discover the validity of any of the above statements.

Reading instructions: Just continue to follow the URLs, never to return...

Any true beleiver knows that God created the planet by having created the content of the universe with the big bang, that the bible is educational, not literal, and that sciencehas advanced far more than enough for believers and atheists alike to continue banging God on this issue.

(This textbook would have looked nicer if I knew how to reference the wikipedia and the wiktionary without the arrow graphic for external links).

If this is not the future of textbooks, I don't know what is?

I saw several similar concept textbooks on the slaughterhouse list for deletion.

--Ohadaloni 06:14, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

some copyrighted work
In the Beginning Man Created God.

--Ohadaloni 06:00, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

The SS and the KGB
For the purpose of maintaining equally balanced information throughout the planet, I have decided to construct an army to eliminating all not sharing this opinion.

Will you learn how to do this one from the next wikibooks textbook?

Havn't you guys learned anything from the horrible history of Mankind?

--Ohadaloni 06:14, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Woody Allen
It is better to actually know something before you teach it to others, and it is better to have some experience in writing textbooks, before you can teach it to others.

Not quite quoting, but I learned this fromWoody Allen.

--Ohadaloni 06:14, 20 June 2007 (UTC)