Template talk:Closed

Is anyone else having trouble getting ~ to work in this template? I think it's the undefined tags in my signature - is there any way to get the template to render it properly?  – Mike.lifeguard  | talk 16:35, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Stop hand
I kind of liked the stop hand, how do people feel about bringing it back? Thenub314 (talk) 11:56, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The whole point of the reformat was to address Kayau's issue with the stop hand. Also, it's been tweaked slightly where you want to use with no space after the pipe, or it preformats the text. – Adrignola talk 12:03, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Fair enough, but it wasn't a point I agreed with. Maybe we can find some other way to find a compromise, we could turn the background a shade of red? Or instead use something a little softer, like Emblem-important.svg. I will play around and see if I can find something I like. Thenub314 (talk) 12:50, 25 June 2010 (UTC)


 * PS The second point might explain why I got confused about some formatting earlier. Thenub314 (talk) 12:52, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
 * How do you like the changes I made? Do you think this could benefit from using a collapsed box? Could make reading discussions still open easier. A collapsed box could also help to emphasize that the discussion has been closed. --dark lama  22:24, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I think a collapsed box would be great, using class="collapsed" on a table rather than NavFrame divs. The heading row can show the closing comment with the discussion inside the collapsed zone.  A good idea. – Adrignola talk 22:27, 25 June 2010 (UTC)


 * As far as images go I like a bolder warning sign instead of a quieter info symbol. That being said, if this were collapsible I think the point would come across even better.  So I say we either make it collapsible or tweak the icon to give the sense of warning instead of information. Thenub314 (talk) 14:58, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

So much for phasing out the NavFrame class. – Adrignola talk 12:32, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

Multiple changes
I made multiple changes that I felt were aesthetically good. These are proposals and I kind of expect some of these are going to be reverted or at least opposed. I was being bold. --Dan Polansky (discuss • contribs) 17:24, 22 March 2016 (UTC)