Template talk:Arimaa/Navigation

Tactics vs. strategy
I disagree with splitting tactics and strategy in the manner it appears this is moving toward (taking Template:Arimaa/Strategy into account). Most of the chapters are a combination of tactics and strategy. It would be better just to have one template linking to all chapters. Belteshazzar (discuss • contribs) 17:15, 9 September 2018 (UTC)


 * The navbox at the bottom of each page can list all pages (I changed my mind about this since making this template). Some structure is still desirable; I thought to have three sections —Tactics, Strategy I, Strategy II— with the latter including the subpages of Arimaa/Attacking. Yes, the division is not clean, but I don't think this precludes using it for organisation.
 * Is there to be a navbox at the top of the pages as well? If so, listing all pages there is probably too much. I was following Haskell, where the top box lists only the pages in the current chapter. Risteall (discuss • contribs) 23:16, 9 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Is there any particular reason for placing Setup and Race Positions in II? Belteshazzar (discuss • contribs) 02:24, 10 September 2018 (UTC)


 * The vague distinction is that I is about general principles, while II is about particular phases of the game. Risteall (discuss • contribs) 02:41, 10 September 2018 (UTC)