Template talk:Ada/RM

Possible link to ARM edition in ada-lang.io
To the attention of @CKWG - Ada Magica and whoever may read this. What do you think on linking to the ARM that is being developed with a nice format for this new Ada site: https://ada-lang.io? You can see how it would display below and the code that I've already tested provisionally stored in User:ManuelGR/Template:Ada/RM.

Additional info on GitHub: https://github.com/ada-lang-io/ada-lang-io/issues/48 -- ManuelGR (discuss • contribs) 19:36, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

I haven't looked deeply into ada-lang.io, so I cannot judge its value. However: I cannot see a value in linking to a copy of the RM (plain or annotated) in this site. It really is just a failed attempt to copy the RM, but is full of mistakes: The line numbers are wrong, the annotations are missing, may be also the text is ruined at some places. Why on earth did the creator of this site feel urged to provide a bad copy, when just a link to the original had been OK?

So just do not do it. YMMV

Christoph


 * Let's postpone this decision until the problems in the output are fixed. -- ManuelGR (discuss • contribs) 19:25, 29 September 2022 (UTC).

Update to Ada 2022
Should we change this template to point to the Ada 2022 RM? Now that the standard is published and we are updating to this latest edition, I guess it makes sense. Would it break anything? I guess not, unless there are changes in the heading numbering, which I think aren't done, except for new chapters, but we should probably check it. ManuelGR (discuss • contribs) 18:31, 2 June 2024 (UTC)