Talk:Video Production

Transmission
This page is being added to by attendees from a conference on video distribution on the internet.

Http://www.transmission.cc

We wanted to make our resources available to those outside our loose network, and this seemed a good place.
 * Did the international film database (for independent screeners) ever come to fruition? CMBJ (discuss • contribs) 12:16, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Links and organization
There are three modules linked to only by this book:
 * Video Production/Convergence and collaboration model
 * Video Production/Independent Online Video Distribution
 * Video Production/Basic Virtual Dub Xvid

Are these pages chapters or appendices of this book? If so, please rename these pages to begin with "Video/" via the "move" link at the top of every page. I don't recommend linking to separate chapters only from within other chapters, but rather from an ordered table of contents. If the links are separate books, please be prepared to turn them into academic textbooks. Encyclopedic content would normally go on our sister project, Wikipedia, although it would be allowed in the form of appendices.

Secondly, will this textbook discuss all aspects of video or only video production? Since "video" is a broad subject, I recommend renaming this book to a more descriptive title, such as Video Production (again, via the "move" link at the top of the page).

One other suggestion I have is to change your website links to go to Wikipedia articles instead. Typing Google Video, for example, produces Google Video. You might also be interested in reading a user's New Book Guide. Good luck on your project, hagindaz 04:02, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

Spam
This book appears only to be in existence to act as a spam trap for external links and little actual content. – Adrignola talk 14:44, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Comment about RfD Survival
While the book survived the request for deletion, it seemed agreed by all that this book is in need of heavy clean up, and should be "nearly nuked". If it does not improve it can be (and almost certainly will) be nominated for deletion again. Thenub314 (talk) 11:16, 8 July 2010 (UTC)