Talk:Using Wikibooks/Discussion and Consensus

The ideal wikibookian in a discussion
A section on the rules of rational discussion was missing in this chapter. Here is a try. Of course you are invited to discuss and modify this contribution if you think it should be.--TD (discuss • contribs) 00:11, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Your personal theories about how wikis should be run are fundamentally untrustworthy, given your voluminously documented rants on the subject of personal editorial control. There is no problem here except the one you've brought here with you; let it drop.  --Pi zero (discuss • contribs) 00:30, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Those are not my personal theories, only common sense rules. They are not about how wikis should be run, only about rational discussions. They say nothing about editorial control. Your justification "personal chip-on-shoulder" is not acceptable in a rational discussion. The community should have the possibility to discuss these rules before you erase them.--TD (discuss • contribs) 00:43, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
 * You are surely aware that I have not erased them. And you're just plain wrong about the circumstances.  You hatched this set of "rules" of editorial conduct partway through a one week block for violating policy with your personal crusade for editorial control of "your" books; and when the block expired you shot out like a cork out of a bottle adding your "rules" to Using Wikibooks.  It's not at all credible to claim those rules are something other than a mutated form of your obsessive campaign.  If you've overlooked this yourself, you need to consider your own actions more objectively.  --Pi zero (discuss • contribs) 01:07, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Most of these common sense rules have been written more than one year ago and published in User:Thierry Dugnolle/ Wikibooks for everyone. You erased them from the wikibook. I don't understand why you say that you haven't erased them.--TD (discuss • contribs) 01:18, 18 July 2018 (UTC)