Talk:Usability for Nerds/Software/File Organization

Probably it is the reason of popularity in desktop sector of seamingly useless remote storage services, known as "cloud" (marketed as such, the term itself is meaningless). While it could make a lot of sense to provide complete packages of remote information processing with the same functions as standalone local (or almost local) software for portable devices limited by TDP and processing power, for desktops it could be because of such stupid reasons as advertised and the troubles of an average user you mentioned. Just Coder (discuss • contribs) 12:30, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
 * I think a discussion of such advertising claims would make this wikibook far too voluminous :) Agnerf (discuss • contribs) 06:04, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
 * So, the book should not be voluminous then ?
 * For now, the conclusion is that you are not going to get too far. I wonder what are the reasons. For now, the reasons of some people like you in not going too far in criticizing the actual state of things in industry is that they are tamed by the said industry - which means that if they say something not nice, they may be not given a next sample of hardware to text or invited to different "parties", most of which are made solely for promotion or hidden advertisement. I'm not sure what your case is, but eventually it could be figured out, the usefullness of it is populating the list of the said reasons. Just Coder (discuss • contribs) 07:18, 28 July 2015 (UTC)