Talk:Usability for Nerds

Hi again, Agner ! By this moment it seems to make more and more sense to make a full-featured version of "corrected" book in the format of comments, as it appears that the current "trolling" format draws more attention with the valid points presented (i.e. was referenced in discussion elsewhere). I hope you don't mind much - but from my side there is some fair amount of lack of time and one thing which I'm at disadvantage - my lazyness, hopefully I could force myself to overcome it. Still, there are topics which I can't extend too much, for the reason stated earlier - a better, profound analysis takes much more efforts than a usual academic way, knowledge, practice, and, finally, time. Also the actual disinformation in the "sources" and marketing distortion in them makes the task even more difficult. But I'm already at half way of making myself to do it :). Some topics I don't understand well - such as the whole reasoning for implementing the perforated cards - what was the actual benefit or money laundering or whatever is behind it - as the usual argumentation seems much of a lie to me - why could anyone bother when the task could be better performed by low qualified personnel. Just Coder (discuss • contribs) 18:08, 2 October 2015 (UTC)