Talk:US History/Advancements

Shouldn't Goddard be placed in the '20s? Pittsburgh Poet (discuss • contribs) 20:31, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Could we change the heading of this chapter?
"Advancements" isn't a great title for a section including the Titanic. Pittsburgh Poet (discuss • contribs) 20:37, 9 November 2014 (UTC)


 * It could be better named but it isn't that bad. The idea is to focus on the achievements of the epoch, in fact the depth that it goes about the incident of the sinking is what does not conform to the subject that should be covered, like explaining the economic reasons why there was demand for the ship, even going into the technical details of the vessel itself and some of the innovations behind it wouldn't be more apropos as the ship was not built in the US.
 * If anything the section that covers the Titanic should be renamed the "Transatlantic age" and get into more details on the general topic and the social and economical reasons behind it. --Panic (discuss • contribs) 21:17, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Good idea! Pittsburgh Poet (discuss • contribs) 22:43, 9 November 2014 (UTC)