Talk:UK Database Law

Splitting into subpages
I object to splitting the material to subpages, given it has mere 14,489 bytes. Even 200,000 bytes would still be okay for a single page, although that would be more debatable. Faux improvement by spilling styling sirup over pages is not the preferable way to improve Wikibooks. --Dan Polansky (discuss • contribs) 20:51, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
 * That is a matter of opinion of course. As a reader, a 200K page is almost certainly inaccessible. If I choose not to read it in a single sitting, next time I open the page I may have to page down 50 - 100 times on my phone to pick up where I finished last time. It is, after all, the reader experience that matters most. MarcGarver (discuss • contribs) 09:56, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
 * How is 200 KB page inaccessible, that is, what does it have to do with accessibility? I don't understand. More importantly, the page has under 15 KB. It is in any case usual for Wikipedia articles to have 100 KB, and if there was a genuine problem with that, Wikipedia would change this practice. --Dan Polansky (discuss • contribs) 12:41, 14 May 2023 (UTC)