Talk:Strategy for Information Markets/Glossary

TDang review April 2012
I'm reviewing this version. I'll likely be more critical than complimentary, because (a) that's the way I am and (b) that's what will help improve things. Please don't take the criticism-over-compliments to mean I have a wholly negative view.

Make sure to check the all-purpose review thoughts as well.

TDang (discuss • contribs) 04:34, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I made a formatting change to "vaporware", you can see it here. That did two things:
 * It put it into a more-formalized definition-list kind of format.
 * It added an "anchor", which will allow other pages to link directly to that glossary entry. For instance, you can see that I changed the link to "vaporware" to go to the glossary instead of Wikipedia, here's the change.
 * Doing similar for the other entries would be good--do it here first before worrying about linking other things here, but once you've done all of the entries here, linking from the other pages (only within this book) would be worthwhile.
 * Check your alphabetical order. It's mostly right, but there are some things out of place.
 * Fleshing out the glossary entries, two things per entry would be good, getting as far as you can:
 * A link to the best place in the book to see more detailed discussion of that topic
 * A reference outside of the book to a good definition/discussion of the topic.
 * The above should give you plenty to work on. I think having this glossary is good for the book. If you notice things in the book which are missing from the glossary, do add them. (I noticed "monopoly" is missing.)