Talk:Role Playing Games

I am not sure if this would fit any criteria for speedy del (I am aware that we shouldn't accept strategy guides, but that does not seem to be what the author wants to do). Assuming the subject can be deemed within scope this looks like a valid stub to me. I would give the author a chance to see exactly where he wants to get. By the way: I don't think the redlinks mentioned at the edit summary were "joke links", but rather a naive way of adding emphasis to words. --Duplode (talk) 03:02, 25 May 2010 (UTC)


 * I agree that it doesn't seem to completely fall under anything in WB:SPEEDY. Specifically, under criteria #5 it should go to RFD, but on the other hand it's not actually CSD'd yet. Granted, it doesn't seem like this module has much hope so maybe it should go to RFD sooner, but the template used does give 7 days before it gets CSD'd and it's only been a bit more than 2. Xerol Oplan (talk) 03:13, 25 May 2010 (UTC)


 * The page was queried less than a hour after creation, and a book about RPGs probably could be within scope (say, by providing and overview of the types of pen-and-paper and video game RPGs and their usual conventions). I feel it would be fair to give the newbie author a chance to develop it, so I removed the query. (I watchlisted the page to remind myself of RfDing it in case the author disappears leaving just this stub behind) --Duplode (talk) 03:37, 25 May 2010 (UTC)