Talk:Relationships/Hormones

The article seems to have been handled with kid gloves by a homophobic child who most likely was and/or may still be a virgin. The paper is lacking in transitions and appears to be poorly paraphrased citations. The citations look like they were misconstrued and without sufficient context can give the reader a false impression of the material. Footnote 71 is by far the most stupid citation. Not only is this article opinionated---it's ridiculous. I suggest researching the material independently and thoroughly.

124.170.70.95 (talk) 13:15, 15 April 2010 (UTC) The above comments/dispute by a 'Wikibookian' are child-like, offensive and lacking rationality. The original article/its authors do not deserve this emotionally reactive and rude critique. I don't know how to remove a disute/warning, but that's what should happen here. As the above Wikibookian is unable to maintain objectivity and calm when dealing with personal 'hot button' topics and is thereby causing harm to the community and to the quality of content, he should preferably have his Wikibookian privilages withdrawn.
 * They, like you, were not logged in and therefore there is no way of identifying the individual who made the comment. Even if we could, it wouldn't be grounds for a block - everyone is entitled to their opinion. QU TalkQu 20:56, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

I tend to agree that the first comment seems to be opinionated by personal feelings rather than fact. I have been researching this topic for quite some time and feel the information is accurate as it can be, and up to date with the science I have read in other places. My personal disclaimer is that I am NOT a scientist, or doctor. As far as the 1st comment goes, he states the topic was handled with kid gloves, and then added some rude personal comments, which in itself discredits the commentator. I didn't feel the article was handled with kid gloves, however, it didn't seem to hit in the area of homosexuality as much as commentator number 1 seemed to want it to go. My personal research is the origin, effects, of all the hormones listed here. Especially testosterone, as a man who is getting weekly injections to correct low levels of the hormone. I am also trying to gain information as to the effects progesterone, estrogen, and testosterone on women. No, I didn't go through all the citations, I can just tell from other reading done in books, online, and with conversations with my physician, the information is quite accurate.

In short, this is simply a terrible book/resource. Where to begin? The range of references is far too narrow. The 'style' reads like a terrible powerpoint presentation. It's short on chemical/medical research, and big on trashy-psuedo-science. The final footnote is nothing short of a opinionated nonsense. As the first comment suggests, this 'book' requires much work and more critical thinking.