Talk:Radiation Oncology/Palliation/Brain Metastases/SRS

"SRS alone comparable to WBRT + SRS, in active extracranial disease. Unclear if WBRT needed in controlled extracranial disease; retrospective evidence suggests worse outcome without it"

First sentence in error? My correction would be "WBRT alone comparable to WBRT + SRS, in active extracranial disease (or poor performance status)" or SRS alone comparable to WBRT + SRS in controlled disease (with good performance status)" but I believe the second part of the sentence addresses this latter point.

Thanks
 * Yes, I would agree. Thanks for noticing it!Tdvorak (talk) 02:56, 2 March 2010 (UTC)