Talk:Public International Law/International Law in Cyberspace

Review: 7 June 2023
Dear Pia,

I can only add to this - I really enjoyed reading this excellent chapter and only added some small comments. At times, I think the language could be a bit more efficient in the interest of the word count.

Best, Raffaela

--Raffaela Kunz (discuss • contribs) 12:56, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

Review: 31 May 2023
Dear Pia,

I really enjoyed reading your chapter. Please find detailed feedback in the comments. Thank you for being part of the team and contributing this important, well-written, and informative chapter.

With best wishes,

Sué

Sué González Hauck (discuss • contribs) 18:27, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Review: May 17, 2023
Your chapter effectively balances both depth and accessibility, making it easy for students to grasp the complexity of cyberspace issues in international law. One of the strengths of your chapter is its well-placed emphasis on key aspects. It covers the most significant legal documents, discussions, and events, which is particularly helpful for students to understand the relevance. By providing a contextual background, the chapter students readers to connect theory with real-world applications.

Your discussion of ICJ judgments, state practices, and other sources of international law adds depth to the chapter. By examining these legal authorities, students gain a comprehensive understanding of the legal landscape surrounding cyberspace. The inclusion of such references enhances the textbook nature of the chapter.

Your chapter slightly exceeds the 9,000w word limit. Because incorporating the comments and suggestions may further lengthen the text, I have provided recommendations for potential reductions where appropriate.

Some minor things:

- Please use OSCOLA as your citation style and make sure you provide full and accurate references for all sources cited. It is important to take the time to ensure that all footnotes are correctly formatted according to OSCOLA.

- You will also find some comments in your chapter in which I elaborate on something more specifically. To view these comments, just open you chapter page and click on "Edit" in the top-right toolbox.

- Note also that the following parts are still missing: required knowledge, learning objectives, further readings

- You could add some links to other chapters of the textbook.

- Note that I have made some linguistic improvements to the text

If you have any questions on how to use Wikibooks to update your chapter, do not hesitate to contact me.

Max Milas (discuss • contribs) 13:10, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

Review: 26 August 2021
Dear Mando, Victor & Milan,

Thank you for this first outline! As this outline seems to be work in progress, a feedback regarding content is difficult. However, I think that you should think of a more sophisticated structure for students. For example, you could start with describing the international regime for law in cyberspace, move on with interactions between cyberspace and other fields of PIL (e.g. human rights law, sovereignty, law of armed conflict) and end with a short outlook on contemporary challenges if you like. Please keep in mind that I'm not an ex--Raffaela Kunz (discuss • contribs) 13:34, 31 October 2021 (UTC)pert in cyberspace law. Feel free to reject my ideas!

Technically, you can add yourselves as authors and link to your user page (see, for example, my chapter on Case Analysis). In addition, some of the sub-headings are not yet properly formatted. We have described how to do this here.

Thank you very much for your work and keep it up!

--Max Milas (discuss • contribs) 14:26, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

Chapter Review:

Dear Mando, Victor & Milan, It seems like that the chapter is progressing well. Looking forward to reading substantively developed parts soon. Best wishes!!! Imdad

Dear Mando, Victor & Milan, Thanks also from my side for the first outline! I agree that it is still difficult to give feedback. However, some initial thoughts:

1) I find the title "Cyberspace" a bit misleading. As such, cyberspace is not a sub-field of international law. Maybe rather choose something along the lines of "the international law governing cyberspace" or "international legal issues in relation to cyberspace"? 2) I don't understand the logic of the current structure and would suggest that you use broader themes for the headings with several sub-titles. What are the broad themes that you would like to discuss? For example several of the issues you bring up relate to the broader issue of "internet governance" (such as sovereignty, jurisdiction and what you discuss under K); another broader title could be "actors", another one "specific legal issues" under which you discuss human rights issues, cyber espionage, cybercrime etc. I think it would be helpful to more clearly guide readers as to how the different aspects of the structure relate to each other and to which broader theme/complex of questions they belong.

Looking forward to reading more on this! --Raffaela Kunz (discuss • contribs) 18:43, 31 October 2021 (UTC)