Talk:Public International Law/International Economic Law/Trade Law

Review: May 26, 2023
Your meticulous description of international economic law showcases your dedication to providing a comprehensive understanding of the subject matter. Students will undoubtedly find this chapter to be an invaluable resource, as it leaves no questions unanswered.

One notable aspect of your work is your pleasant writing style, which is particularly appealing to students. Your ability to convey complex concepts in a clear and engaging manner is commendable. The clarity of your explanations ensures that students can grasp the intricacies of international economic law without feeling overwhelmed, facilitating their comprehension and learning experience.

However, I must address the significant challenge presented by the chapter's word count. As agreed, the chapter should not exceed 9,000 words, yet it currently stands at 27,000 words. To ensure its inclusion in the textbook, substantial reductions are necessary. I have provided numerous suggestions for trimming the chapter's length in the text. Once you have uploaded a condensed version, I will be happy to review it again.

Furthermore, I noticed that in certain sections, footnotes are either missing or cases are not properly cited. It is crucial to include appropriate footnotes to provide proper attribution and enhance the chapter's scholarly value.

Some minor things:
 * Note that the following parts are still missing: required knowledge, learning objectives, conclusion
 * There are some issues with the formatting of the footnotes, which are not always consistent with the OSCOLA citation style. To ensure the chapter is fully compliant with OSCOLA, you should review the formatting of the footnotes and make the necessary corrections.
 * You could add some links to other chapters of the textbook.
 * Note that I have made some linguistic improvements to the text

--Max Milas (discuss • contribs) 19:36, 26 May 2023 (UTC)