Talk:Public International Law/International Criminal Law/Domestic Prosecution of International Crimes

Review: 13 June 2023
Dear Raghavi,

The chapter still seems to be a quite rough draft. Given that the focus lies on domestic prosecution, I was expecting some more elaborations on the role of domestic courts in ICL - but maybe this is yet to come.

Best, Raffaela --Raffaela Kunz (discuss • contribs) 15:23, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

Review: May 26, 2023
Your chapter offers a detailed overview of universal jurisdiction, covering its various aspects and intricacies. However, I find it perplexing that the chapter exclusively focuses on universal jurisdiction while neglecting to discuss other means of jurisdiction in prosecuting international crimes. It would greatly enhance the comprehensiveness of your chapter if you also incorporate discussions on other jurisdictional means, such as territorial jurisdiction and passive personality jurisdiction. You should also think of shortening the part on universal jurisdiction as the hole chapter on ICL is divided into four sub-chapters and already exceeds the word limit.

You will also find some comments in your chapter in which I elaborate on something more specific. To view these comments, open your chapter page and click "Edit" in the top-right menu bar.

Some minor things:


 * Note that the following parts are still missing: further readings, summary
 * There are some issues with the formatting of the footnotes, which are not consistent with the OSCOLA citation style. To ensure the chapter is fully compliant with OSCOLA, you should review the formatting of the footnotes and make the necessary corrections.
 * You could add some links to other chapters of the textbook.
 * Note that I have made some linguistic improvements to the text

Max Milas (discuss • contribs) 14:55, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

.