Talk:Public International Law/Immunities

Review: 27 May 2023
Dear Beatrice,

I completely agree with Max. This is an outstanding chapter, and I am looking forward to seeing the full draft. Even the parts that are just in bullet points seem really well-developed, and they offer some critical and historical context, which fits very well with the overall approach of the book. Thank you so much! Unfortunately, I also have to remind you to remain within the 9000-word limit, given that we are struggling to keep the book overall under the word count on which we agreed with Routledge.

Warm regards,

Sué

Sué González Hauck (discuss • contribs) 14:00, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

Review: May 20, 2023
Your chapter on immunity law provides a well-structured, comprehensible, and systematic treatment of this subject matter. It offers a thorough discussion of the most relevant issues. The chapter stands out for its excellent and detailed analysis of court decisions related to immunity law. The inclusion of these cases enhances the readers' understanding and provides practical examples to illustrate the concepts discussed. I particularly appreciate the critical perspective presented in certain sections of the chapter. By offering this alternative viewpoint, it encourages students to engage in a deeper analysis of the complexities surrounding immunity law.

While the chapter is already quite lengthy, it is important to ensure that the word count does not exceed the 9,000-word limit. Despite the need for further elaboration in some parts, it is essential to maintain a balance between providing comprehensive content and adhering to the word limit.

You will also find some comments in your chapter in which I elaborate on something more specifically. To view these comments, just open your chapter page and click on "Edit" in the top-right menu bar.

Some minor things:


 * Some parts of the chapter are still missing. It would be great if you could finish the chapter by mid-June at the latest. The sooner you finish, the better we can review your chapter and the more time you have to use our comments to improve the chapter. Be prepared to edit your chapter at very short notice if you hand it in late.


 * There are some issues with the formatting of the footnotes, which are not always consistent with the OSCOLA citation style. To ensure the chapter is fully compliant with OSCOLA, you should review the formatting of the footnotes and make necessary corrections.
 * Note also that the following parts are still missing: required knowledge, learning objectives, further readings, conclusion
 * You could add some links to other chapters of the textbook.
 * Note that I have made some linguistic improvements to the text

Max Milas (discuss • contribs) 14:30, 20 May 2023 (UTC)