Talk:Public International Law/Human Rights Law/Human Rights Protection/European Human Rights System

Review: 9 June 2023
Dear Jens,

Thanks and congratulations also from my side - fantastic chapter, I added only some minor points.

Best,

Raffaela --Raffaela Kunz (discuss • contribs) 09:19, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

Review: 6 June 2023
Dear Jens,

Thank you for this amazing chapter! I have added very few comments on details, but, in general, I think this chapter is good to go.

Herzlich

Sué

Sué González Hauck (discuss • contribs) 10:47, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

Review: May 26, 2023
Your chapter provides a clear and concise overview, allowing students to gain a solid understanding of the subject matter while delving into important details. The chapter covers essential aspects of the European human rights system, allowing students to grasp its structure, key institutions, and legal framework. I also greatly appreciate the inclusion of critical perspectives in your chapter. The manner in which you introduce and define technical terms before incorporating them into the text is highly effective. This practice ensures that students, including those without prior knowledge of the subject, can follow the content with ease.

You will also find some comments in your chapter in which I elaborate on something more specific. To view these comments, open your chapter page and click "Edit" in the top-right menu bar.

Note that I have made some linguistic improvements to the text.

--Max Milas (discuss • contribs) 07:54, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

Review: 26 August 2021
Dear Jens,

Thank you for submitting this outline. I enjoyed reviewing it and I'm really looking forward to read the hole chapter in a few months. This looks like an amazing chapter that is really helpful for students. Regarding content I have nothing to add so far.

Technically, you could insert a link to your user page on wikibooks next to "Author" at the beginning of this page (see, for example, my chapter on Case Analysis).

Thank you very much for your work and keep it up!

--Max Milas (discuss • contribs) 15:12, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

comments on current draft
Hi Jens. Thanks for this. It reads well! A few comments below:

1) inter-State applications seem to have regained some relevance the last few years. Perhaps it is worthwhile noting this in a sentence.

2) the significant disadvantage requirement could perhaps also be mentioned when referring to the admissibility criteria (under ECtHR + procedures section)

3) On the issue of "backlash" and responses by States with AP, I take it that you will refer to the principle of subsidiarity?

4) Perhaps a couple of sentences to be added on the enforcement/monitoring of the implementation of ECtHR's judgments by the Council of Ministers?

5) In footnotes or weblinks you could refer to some of the resources available on the ECtHR's website? :)

Cheers! Mando