Talk:Principles of Biochemistry

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
This book has literally hundreds of red links. Shouldn't they all be changed to link to the corresponding Wikipedia articles? I am FED UP with them all! --Whoop whoop pull up Bitching Betty 21:56, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Wikibooks prefers the content to be incorporated into the book, not linked to Wikipedia. Usually the best clean-up approach is to delete all the red links rather than convert them to inter-wiki links. Generally a WP link should only be used for obscure but directly relevant points that would not be included in a book. For example, in a book on US relations with Iran you wouldn't WP link to "Iran" or "1980" or "Jimmy Carter" as this is totally unnecessary in a book. However, you might WP link to "Operations Eagle's Claw" for more detail on the attempt to rescue the hostages. QU TalkQu 22:03, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
 * So remove the freakin' redlinks! --Whoop whoop pull up Bitching Betty 23:38, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
 * An alternative is to flag the pages as copyvios for copying material from Wikipedia without sufficient attribution. Then after a week they can be deleted. I have warned the author on his talk page that this is likely to happen. Recent Runes (discuss • contribs) 23:47, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
 * OK. --Whoop whoop pull up Bitching Betty 23:56, 5 April 2011 (UTC) Then why aren't they flagged as copyvios? --Whoop whoop pull up Bitching Betty 21:45, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Because people like you would rather moan than stick their own ruddy necks out I guess. Recent Runes (discuss • contribs) 22:07, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Same for you, judging by the fact that you have not flagged them either. Fine.  I'll do it myself! --Whoop whoop pull up Bitching Betty 13:23, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
 * And I've done that! --Whoop whoop pull up Bitching Betty 13:41, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not a source
Hello. Kaushlendratripathi has been continually asking me to remove the banner from pages that cite only Wikipedia as a source. Can someone help me persuade him to cite only sources other than Wikipedia? --Whoop whoop pull up Bitching Betty 12:42, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I added the attribution as suggested by QU

Hello, I have looked at what you are doing and I think you have misunderstood the requirement. It is not sufficient to just provide a link to the Wikipedia article you copied the material from. That is is not good enough. You need to provide a link to the version of the Wikipedia article you copied. So, in Wikipedia, you need to select "Permanent link" from the tool box to get a URL that is unique to the version you copied, then use that in the Wikibooks page like this example:. Hopefully this is clear, if not please ask. Thanks 15:53, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

I am asking to remove copyvio from those chapter where i have added attribution i am not requesting from those chapter where i have not added the attribution. thanks kaushlendratripathikaushlendratripathi (discuss • contribs)

This book cannot be browsed
It seems to me that this book is not in this list -->> http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Subject:Life_sciences. Although there are couple of wikibooks on biochemistry, I find this to be pretty good and organized even though at the moment I feel it lacks in some few areas, proteins and amino acid metabolism maybe abit on enzymes,etc. but its probably the same if not more completed than the other wikibook on biochemistry. So how do we move this book in that section where we can easily find it? Because this book is only accessible through searching. (By the way since this is brought up, how do we do this anyway, to move books in those lists?) Thanos Sofroniou (discuss • contribs) 22:06, 2 November 2012 (UTC)