Talk:Poker

I suppose I should have included this site in my due diligence for setting up PokerWiki. What is the consensus for the appopriate scope of PokerWiki versus Wikibooks:Poker? While I'm hoping PW grows into more than a manual for playing -- and indeed, the earliest traffic has been heaviest in our Casinos section, documenting what games are available where -- I also realize there's some potential for overlap, and I wouldn't want to duplicate efforts. Thoughts, anyone?

Cheers, PhilipR - 63.81.205.21 18:05, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)


 * Apparently no one else is bothered by duplication so I guess I won't worry about it. - PhilipR.   71.192.214.166 22:11, 14 December 2005 (UTC)


 * I think the goals of the two projects are somewhat different. Plus, some people might feel that they'd rather work with the Wikimedia Foundation.  -- bkuhn 21:46, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Contributors to this book may be interested in making Transwiki:Four Corners Solitaire into a book (or part of one). – Mike.lifeguard  &#124; talk 03:13, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Encyclopedia of poker variants?
At the moment this book seems to be a combination of a strategy guide with a compendium of different (and often extremely rare) variants of poker. This feels to me like two books, or perhaps one book with the description of rare variants belonging in another wiki. Does anyone else have a view on this? Personally, I think a strategy guide to poker where variants are documented only to illuminate discussions within the text seems like a coherent book. --Fishpi (talk) 22:30, 14 July 2010 (UTC)