Talk:NES Programming/Memory Map

Review for Quality
To be fair, it's probably best to use the NESDev Wiki instead, as it's highest in authority. Reason: It's been reviewed by programmers and experts extensively. The OR/reliable source issues are entirely gone now. The hobbyist (and official!) documentation used to have a lot of assumptions, errors, and missed edge cases, but it has been heavily reviewed and tested and revised in the last decade, and there is now also the Visual 2A03 and Visual 2C02 simulators that are based on decapped chips. In theory, you can't get much more accurate than a simulation at the gate level! I'll post a link to them as a reference in an edit in a moment.
 * In other words, those older text files are good references but heavily outdated. The translations of Japanese documents were pretty bad, also.  Not sure if this Wiki has "Original Research" quality control but it's definitely an issue if relying on older documents that haven't been reviewed by many skilled eyes.  73.95.132.140 (discuss) 10:53, 5 February 2019 (UTC)