Talk:Macroeconomics/Contents

What's the Australian perspective? Are you sure you don't mean Austrian school perspective? --Waxmop 16:39, 7 Aug 2004 (UTC)

The Money Supply
Wikipedia has a pretty decent article on the Money Supply, shouldn't this be added to this project?

AE or AD
I've always been brought up with Aggregate Demand (AD), not AE (Aggregate Expenditure?). Advice? Opinion? --Mark Lewis 22:54, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Change
I've created a proposal list of chapters to change to, a Template:Macrobar to be used as navigation, and a basic first chapter that gives an overview of economics. I think the present structure throws out the windows any logical order of learning concepts and breaks it down into chunks which are too small. I don't recommonmend just throwing it out however, but integrating it into the new scheme, which can expand or change easily based on others' input.--Naryathegreat|(talk) 03:25, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
 * I have renamed the template to /bar, in keeping with recent naming conventions. --Pi zero (discuss • contribs) 23:50, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Update
Is anyone currently working on this wikibook? I can't seem to see many recent changes in the economics bookshelf.... DettoAltrimenti 04:42, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

I suggest that these subjects be covered under a section for GDP, not Aggregate Demand (these are all listed under Aggregate Demand in the pre-change TOC). DettoAltrimenti 18:34, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Consumption
 * Investment
 * Government Spending –almost empty
 * Imports-Exports –almost empty

Content
It would seem that a book should be viewed in it's entirety and not as a semblance of the whole, therefore I believe there should be some information on the history of macroeconomics including subjects such as Keynes Eroyce 15:00:34, 15 December 2005

I would agree- in most books I've read, the history of economics was brought up in the introduction, and again as it was necessary. An example would be explaining keynesian and classical economics with the aggregate supply curve, and maybe throw something in there about the 1929 stock market crash. Most of this book needs to be looked over and edited fairly heavily, though. DettoAltrimenti 21:04, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

Organization
this book should be organized, and links made, before any major changes are added. Also, the name of this book should be 'Principles of Macroeconomics'- to avoid confusion- there is no macroeconomic theory in this book. DettoAltrimenti 16:58, 16 December 2005 (UTC)