Talk:Lentis/Nanotechnology and Health

I really like the changes you made to the social groups Annie. (AA)

Wiki Chapter Guidelines: Summary of useful comments from index cards:
 * Writing suits the audience
 * Length - about 1600 words
 * Chapter coheres
 * Well organized - use headings
 * Well linked (to user friendly secondary sources)
 * Non-propriety images
 * 1) Wanted to here more about nanotechnology stakeholders
 * 2) Include spectrum of stakeholders
 * 3) Include a larger variety of perspectives from non-technical groups
 * 4) "Message may have been made clearer by a today vs. the future analysis rather than individual fields as top level organization"
 * 5) "Chapter might include the perspectives of each group mentioned in the 'spectrum' and an analysis of why"
 * 6) "Why are we as a culture hesitant to use them?"
 * 7) Include more specific case studies
 * 8) Cite scientific case studies pointing to potential heath risks of nanotechnology
 * 9) "Could have gone into more details about amount of research money spent developing nanotechnology"
 * 10) "Include more on cultural factors (especially transhumanists which sound hilarious)"
 * 11) "Focus some more on how society will view these new innovations"
 * 12) "I was confused by the link between nanotechnology and immortality - might be useful to explain"
 * 13) "'Small' steps - opportunity for a 'nano' joke?"
 * 14) "Could elaborate more on the fears of certain groups
 * 15) "Elaborate more on specific groups like government, policy workers, transhumanists"
 * 16) "Might help to have a little more technical detail on what's made nanotechnology possible. What it does and doesn't enable. That is, it all still seems like 'magic' to me."
 * 17) "Could've been slightly less technical at times"
 * 18) Spent too much time on introducing "fancy" nanotechnologies. Emphasize the social interface facet.