Talk:Lentis/Grand Theft Auto: Violent Video Games and Controversy

News reporting
One of the articles I read talked about how news reporting of the psychological link between media violence and aggression hasn't really changed in the last 30 years despite increased evidence for the link. Do you think it's worth mentioning that in my section? I would likely have to cut down all the other parts a bit. TomSmilack (discuss • contribs) 23:20, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

It's interesting but I would say that we can leave it out if there are other, more important things to say. StevoBailey (discuss • contribs) 02:57, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

Word limit
We're over 1800 words and still need a conclusion. I'll cut down my explanation of the experiment but we all probably need to trim a little bit. TomSmilack (discuss • contribs) 23:48, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

I will trim my section. Who wants to write the conclusion? StevoBailey (discuss • contribs) 02:57, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

There is no "limit." We'll be fine with having more than 1800 words. StevoBailey (discuss • contribs) 01:34, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

We have about 1850 words as of now. Very appropriate length in my opinion.Sanbi shahjahan (discuss • contribs) 03:42, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

Pictures
We currently have no images. I can add some to my section, but I feel that they will not add to the purpose much. Thoughts? StevoBailey (discuss • contribs) 02:59, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

I think the only picture appropriate for my sections is of Jack Thompson. I will try to find some copyright free pics of Grand Theft Auto Game play.Sanbi shahjahan (discuss • contribs) 03:40, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

Hmm... I am looking in Wikimedia Commons, but so far no luck finding decent GTA pics.Sanbi shahjahan (discuss • contribs) 03:53, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

Apologists intro
I took out the line about the first amendment protecting the right to purchase games, and my edit comment was "the first amendment doesn't say anything about what minors are allowed to buy." I checked out the First Amendment Center story on the Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association case and it basically says the exact opposite of my comment, so I read the syllabus of the Supreme Court's opinion and it seems a bit more complicated than that. You guys can put the line back in if you want but IMO it's an iffy claim and the paragraph is stronger without it. TomSmilack (discuss • contribs) 03:49, 6 December 2011 (UTC)