Talk:Issues in interdisciplinarity 2018-19/Reliability of Legal Evidence

Go over what I have written and cut down section, also mention comparaison to other tools of forensic science. Cut down the Innocence project part. Insert my refrences. Hbcoste (discuss • contribs) 16:37, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

Hannah: long paragraph should be cut down- don't relate it to how DNA might by faulty --Uclqiya (discuss • contribs) 16:41, 3 December 2018 (UTC) WHAT TO ASK word count, refernce, introduction --Uclqiya (discuss • contribs) 16:44, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

((maybe move the first part to the beginning of the section)) First paragraph of 'concerns of DNA'

ADD a definition of EVIDENCE- what do we understand by evidence?? - Make sure to show how it is interdisciplinarity - using psychology as a way to asses the reliability of evidence. - make the use of concept of 'reliability' clear - explore what reliability means depending on the type of evidence/discipline. Hbcoste (discuss • contribs) 14:44, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

We will be introducing the topic from a psychological viewpoint and scientific veiwpoint testemonies are not reliable-psychology- direct implications to what we count as evidence scientific evidence are not reliable- human error

Can you guys read the notes that I made?