Talk:Issues in Interdisciplinarity 2020-21/Evidence in the Medicinal usage of Cannabis

Work before the 11th of December
The group has worked and communicated collaboratively on WhatsApp, Zoom and Google Docs. From the 11th of December and forward we will add the work we have done to the Wikibooks page and explain the process on this discussion page.

Edits done on the 11th of December

 * The group collaboratively created the headline and outlined the structure of the chapter, Emma simply added the work to the page.
 * Daniel added his work under the "Evidence for Psychology" headline.
 * Daniel created a table of contents.
 * Emma added her work under the "Evidence in Pharmacology" headline.
 * Pierre added his work under the "Evidence in law" headline.
 * Emma also added a draft to the introduction. However, the group will collaboratively add references and adapt the introduction during a zoom-meeting on the 12th of December.
 * Emma had to repost her information due to it being removed by a foregin user.

Edits done on the 12th of December

 * The group collaboratively moved the chapter to be a part of the main wikibook.
 * Daniel proposed another draft to the introduction. The group collaboratively integrated that into the previous introduciton and created the final version.
 * The group collaboratively created the first and general part of the conclusion.
 * Emma added some sources and added some of her work under the "Evidence in Pharmacology" headline

Edits done on the 13th of December
Daniel, I saw what you added to the conclusion and it was great! I agree with many of the aspects you mentioned, from the aspect of pharmacology as well, so I decided to integrate my conclusions with yours. I also did some edits in the conclusion we wrote yesterday and moved it to the bottom of the conclusion to get a better flow in the ending. I hope you think it turned out well. I did however save what you had written at the top of the concluion within brackets, so if you dont like what I did we could reverse it. // Emma
 * Emma deleted some work from the Pharmacology headline to get within the word count. She also worked a bit on the conclusion.
 * Pierre has added the part of the conclusion that concerns the discipline of law, following some guidance from Emma

+ We have not used the exact same format on our references, we need to sort that out on zoom tonight. //Emma


 * The group had a zoom meeting where we together integrated the conclusion. We also cut some text to get within the word limit (please note that some word couting programs see the brackets for references (e.g [1]) as words, but we have not included the numbers in our word count).
 * Each of the members proof read the chapter
 * Emma were assigned to make sure all references followed the same format

Edits done on the 14th of December
Added some sources and proof reading

Descriptive summary of the work process
When the assignment were intoduced, the group started brainstorming ideas. Daniel came up with the initial idea of medicinal use of recreational drugs. The disciplines we used to show the interdisciplinarity of the issue was collaboratively decided by the group. The group communicated regularly on WhatsApp and Zoom meetings. A collaborative Google Document was also used by the group to write down notes from sources and start building a structure for the chapter. Initially, the group collaboratively brainstormed and gathered sources from all three disciplines to gain an interdisciplinary understanding of the issue. When the writing work began, we assigned one of the group members to focus on one discipline each. Daniel then focused on Psychology, Emma on Pharmacology and Pierre on Law. The sources gathered in each of the disciplines and the primary additions to the chapter are therefore done according to this. However, hence the regular communication on WhatsApp and Zoom, the group has given each other feedback on changing sources, structure and grammar.

The introduction and conclusion consist of both individual drafts and have written by the group while discussing on zoom, and different people have been assigned to write it down in the document.