Talk:Issues in Interdisciplinarity 2018-19/Imperialism and Humanitarian Architecture

I think we should change our research question from: How failed architectural programmes in humanitarianism is an imperialistic legacy? to: ''To what extent are failed humanitarian architectural programmes a failed imperialistic legacy? ''. What do you guys think?

We should swap our research question to: To what extent are humanitarian architectural programmes an imperialistic legacy? Clozinskabrown (discuss • contribs) 13:17, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

We should add a part about the successful humanitarian programs, or change the question to something else than "to what extend" Hadrienstrichard (discuss • contribs) 13:21, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

For argument 3 - we should tie more to developmental studies. Important to thread through more interdisciplinary tensions. Clozinskabrown (discuss • contribs) 13:46, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

For putting more interdisciplinary tensions we could add a part about where is the boundary or where should be the boundary between an architectural project and a project dealing with a humanitarian issue

If we have room - take risk!! what would be a better example, a better project! (Renzo Piano!!) What would the bad building look like if it was better? Uclqffb (discuss • contribs) 10:43, 5 December 2018 (UTC)