Talk:Islam In The World/Amnesty

changing the some words in the page
Thanks for participating in this book, but should it be depended on the point of view of the west? for example "Amnesty attacks Saudi Arabia applying of Sharia law in retribution (killing who kills)".was replaced with "Against the use of applying Sharia law when violating human rights" so now Amnesty doesn't attack but Sharia law violate human rights!!?

I don't recall that we all agreed on what is the "Human Rights" and I believe we have different thoughts about it. I'm going to change the sentence. does any one have some thing to say? الحارث بن همام (talk) 03:42, 9 June 2009 (UTC)


 * I updated the text shortly thereafter. Amnesty International shares its thoughts of human rights as dictated by several UN articles on the same subject.   The problem with your sentence is that you cherrypicked an event.   This is more of a POV agenda against Amnesty International.  Please don't do this.  Amnesty International is against anything stated by the UN to be an infringement of human rights regardless of what a religion or any other doctrine may say.   These beliefs by this organization are stated on their webpage.  Whether or not you like it does not change the fact that you must keep this NPOV.  -- Retropunk (talk) 04:10, 9 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Good the words now is better. :) الحارث بن همام (talk) 11:13, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I do not know the Sharia law, so you'll need to make sure it's only "some" and not "all". -- Retropunk (talk) 16:25, 9 June 2009 (UTC)