Talk:IB Theory of Knowledge

There are several factual inaccuraties on this page, thus it requires extensive editing to be acceptable.

I'm confused. By 1980 the philosophical ethics line of neo-Aristotelianism (e.g. MacIntyre) had demonstrated that ethics was not part of empirical knowledge, emotion, reason. It was assigned by MacIntyre to narrative language: but it is not a convincing answer, either, just a leftover one.

How can ethics be subsumed under epistemology, when it's clear that it's not part of it, but a separate discipline of philosophy?

FInally, the last statement is logically contradictory. If all knowing is wrong, then knowing all knowing is wrong, is wrong, and thus some knowing is correct. Are you saying the TOK class is itself logically contradictory?

Textbooks
Maybe we could add the commonly used textbooks.

Introduction to Philosophy - Louis P. Pojman Theory of Knowledge for the IB Diploma Certificate - Richard van de Lagemaat etc.